Literature DB >> 16115935

Objective responses in patients with malignant melanoma or renal cell cancer in early clinical studies do not predict regulatory approval.

John Goffin1, Stefan Baral, Dongsheng Tu, Dora Nomikos, Lesley Seymour.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tumor responses in early-phase trials are used to determine whether new agents warrant further study. Given that spontaneous regressions are observed in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma, this study assessed whether tumor responses, particularly in these two tumor types, predict for future regulatory drug approval. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: The literature was reviewed to assess tumor response rates to cytotoxic agents in phase I and II trials in the following solid tumors: melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, and other solid tumors. Response rates were categorized and the relationship of these categories to the end point of regulatory drug approval was determined.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight drugs were assessed in 100 phase I trials, and 46 of these drugs were also studied in 499 phase II trials. Higher overall response rates in both phase I trials (P = 0.03) and phase II trials (P < 0.0001) were predictive of regulatory approval. However, response in melanoma or renal cell carcinoma was not predictive for either phase I or phase II studies.
CONCLUSIONS: For cytotoxic agents, although overall objective response rates reliably predict subsequent marketing approval, isolated responses in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma are not predictive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16115935     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  27 in total

1.  Evaluation of molecular targeted cancer drug by changes in tumor marker doubling times.

Authors:  Kenichiro Enooku; Ryosuke Tateishi; Fumihiko Kanai; Yuji Kondo; Ryota Masuzaki; Tadashi Goto; Shuichiro Shiina; Haruhiko Yoshida; Masao Omata; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 2.  Therapeutic cancer vaccines: are we there yet?

Authors:  Christopher A Klebanoff; Nicolas Acquavella; Zhiya Yu; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 3.  Moving beyond response criteria: new measures of success in the treatment of sarcomas.

Authors:  Andrew E Hendifar; Elke Ahlmann; Daniel C Allison; James Hu; Lawrence Menendez; Sant P Chawla
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2012-09

Review 4.  Imaging radiation response in tumor and normal tissue.

Authors:  Marjan Rafat; Rehan Ali; Edward E Graves
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-06-15

5.  Recommended changes to oncology clinical trial design: revolution or evolution?

Authors:  Mark J Ratain; Rachel W Humphrey; Gary B Gordon; Gwen Fyfe; Peter C Adamson; Thomas R Fleming; Walter M Stadler; Donald A Berry; Carl C Peck
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 6.  Monitoring chemotherapy and radiotherapy of solid tumors.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber; Hinrich Wieder
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Exposure-response relationship of AMG 386 in combination with weekly paclitaxel in recurrent ovarian cancer and its implication for dose selection.

Authors:  Jian-Feng Lu; Erik Rasmussen; Beth Y Karlan; Ignace B Vergote; Lynn Navale; Mita Kuchimanchi; Rebeca Melara; Daniel E Stepan; David M Weinreich; Yu-Nien Sun
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  PET imaging of apoptosis in tumor-bearing mice and rabbits after paclitaxel treatment with (18)F(-)Labeled recombinant human His10-annexin V.

Authors:  Haidong Qin; Ming-Rong Zhang; Lin Xie; Yanjie Hou; Zichun Hua; Minjin Hu; Zizheng Wang; Feng Wang
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-12-15

Review 9.  Randomized phase II designs.

Authors:  Larry Rubinstein; John Crowley; Percy Ivy; Michael Leblanc; Dan Sargent
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Sunitinib for advanced renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Chris Coppin
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2008-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.