Literature DB >> 16115656

A horse of a different colour: do patients with semantic dementia recognise different versions of the same object as the same?

M Ikeda1, K Patterson, K S Graham, M A Lambon Ralph, J R Hodges.   

Abstract

Ten patients with semantic dementia resulting from bilateral anterior temporal lobe atrophy, and 10 matched controls, were tested on an object recognition task in which they were invited to choose (from a four-item array) the picture representing "the same thing" as an object picture that they had just inspected and attempted to name. The target in the response array was never physically identical to the studied picture but differed from it - in the various conditions - in size, angle of view, colour or exemplar (e.g. a different breed of dog). In one test block for each patient, the response array was presented immediately after the studied picture was removed; in another block, a 2 min filled delay was inserted between study and test. The patients performed relatively well when the studied object and target response differed only in the size of the picture on the page, but were significantly impaired as a group in the other three type-of-change conditions, even with no delay between study and test. The five patients whose structural brain imaging revealed major right-temporal atrophy were more impaired overall, and also more affected by the 2 min delay, than the five patients with an asymmetric pattern characterised by predominant left-sided atrophy. These results are interpreted in terms of a hypothesis that successful classification of an object token as an object type is not a pre-semantic ability but rather results from interaction of perceptual and conceptual processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16115656     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  11 in total

1.  Interhemispheric differences in knowledge of animals among patients with semantic dementia.

Authors:  Mario F Mendez; Sarah A Kremen; Po-Heng Tsai; Jill S Shapira
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Reversal of the concreteness effect in semantic dementia.

Authors:  Michael F Bonner; Luisa Vesely; Catherine Price; Chivon Anderson; Lauren Richmond; Christine Farag; Brian Avants; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A nonverbal route to conceptual knowledge involving the right anterior temporal lobe.

Authors:  Robert S Hurley; M-Marsel Mesulam; Jaiashre Sridhar; Emily J Rogalski; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The importance of multiple assessments of object knowledge in semantic dementia: the case of the familiar objects task.

Authors:  Evangelia G Chrysikou; Tania Giovannetti; Denene M Wambach; Abigail C Lyon; Murray Grossman; David J Libon
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 0.881

Review 5.  The Differential Contributions of Conceptual Representation Format and Language Structure to Levels of Semantic Abstraction Capacity.

Authors:  Guido Gainotti
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 7.444

6.  'The quicksand of forgetfulness': semantic dementia in One hundred years of solitude.

Authors:  Katya Rascovsky; Matthew E Growdon; Isela R Pardo; Scott Grossman; Bruce L Miller
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 7.  Clinical diagnostic criteria and classification controversies in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Authors:  Katya Rascovsky; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04

Review 8.  The reign of typicality in semantic memory.

Authors:  Karalyn Patterson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Task-Related Dynamic Division of Labor Between Anterior Temporal and Lateral Occipital Cortices in Representing Object Size.

Authors:  Rocco Chiou; Matthew A Lambon Ralph
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Why are the right and left hemisphere conceptual representations different?

Authors:  Guido Gainotti
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.