Literature DB >> 16115151

A randomized, controlled trial of saphenous vein graft intervention with a filter-based distal embolic protection device: TRAP trial.

Simon R Dixon1, J Tift Mann, Michael A Lauer, Paul N Casale, Eric J Dippel, Robert K Strumpf, Robert L Feldman, Wendy Shear, Jon R Resar, Stevan D Zimmer, William W O'Neill.   

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective, multicenter trial was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the TRAP Vascular Filtration System (VFS) to reduce embolic complications during stenting of diseased saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). Patients with SVG lesions were randomly assigned to undergo stenting with or without the TRAP device. The trial was designed to enroll 752 randomized patients. However, the sponsor terminated the study after a total of 467 patients (358 randomized) were enrolled because of poor recruitment once another distal protection device was approved for clinical use. The primary study endpoint, major adverse cardiac events at 30 days, occurred in 17.3% of control patients and 12.7% of patients treated with the TRAP device (P = 0.24). There was a trend toward a lower incidence of myocardial infarction in the TRAP group compared with the control group (16.2% vs 10.5%, P = 0.12). This difference was predominantly due to a lower incidence of moderate-large infarction (CKMB >5x) in the TRAP group. Use of the TRAP VFS during SVG intervention was safe and was associated with a trend toward a lower incidence of adverse events, however, due to low enrollment the study lacked sufficient power to detect a significant benefit with the device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16115151     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2005.00039.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  4 in total

Review 1.  Secondary revascularization after CABG surgery.

Authors:  Javier Escaned
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Saphenous Vein Grafts With and Without Embolic Protection Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jianhong Yu; Jianhai Zhang; Jianchao Ni; Weiqing Shou; Yuanyuan Fang; Suna Fu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-21

3.  Safety and Efficacy of Embolic Protection Devices in Saphenous Vein Graft Interventions: A Propensity Score Analysis-Multicenter SVG PCI PROTECTA Study.

Authors:  Wojciech Wańha; Maksymilian Mielczarek; Natasza Gilis-Malinowska; Tomasz Roleder; Marek Milewski; Szymon Ładziński; Dariusz Ciećwierz; Paweł Gąsior; Tomasz Pawłowski; Rafał Januszek; Adam Kowalówka; Michalina Kolodziejczak; Stanisław Bartuś; Marcin Gruchała; Grzegorz Smolka; Eliano Pio Navarese; Dariusz Dudek; Andrzej Ochała; Elvin Kedhi; Miłosz Jaguszewski; Wojciech Wojakowski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Predicting risk of cardiovascular events 1 to 3 years post-myocardial infarction using a global registry.

Authors:  Stuart J Pocock; David Brieger; John Gregson; Ji Y Chen; Mauricio G Cohen; Shaun G Goodman; Christopher B Granger; Richard Grieve; Jose C Nicolau; Tabassome Simon; Dirk Westermann; Satoshi Yasuda; Katarina Hedman; Kirsten L Rennie; Karolina Andersson Sundell
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.882

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.