Literature DB >> 16113772

Testing differential gene expression in functional groups. Goeman's global test versus an ANCOVA approach.

U Mansmann1, R Meister.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Single genes are not, in general, the primary focus of gene expression experiments. The researcher might be more interested in relevant pathways, functional sets, or genomic regions consisting of several genes. Efficient statistical tools to handle this task are of interest to research of biology and medicine.
METHODS: A simultaneous test on phenotype main effect and gene-phenotype interaction in a two-way layout linear model is introduced as a global test on differential expression for gene groups. Its statistical properties are compared with those of the global test for groups of genes by Goeman et al. in a preliminary simulation study. The procedure presented also allows adjusting for covariates.
RESULTS: The proposed ANCOVA global test is equivalent to Goeman's global test in a setting of independent genes. In our simulation setting for correlated genes, both tests lose power, however with a stronger loss for Goeman's test. Especially in cases where the asymptotic distribution cannot be used, the stratified use of the ANCOVA global test shows a better performance than Goeman's test.
CONCLUSIONS: Our ANCOVA-based approach is a competitive alternative to Goeman's global test in assessing differential gene expression between groups. It can be extended and generalized in several ways by a modification of the projection matrix.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16113772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Inf Med        ISSN: 0026-1270            Impact factor:   2.176


  47 in total

1.  Borrowing strength: a likelihood ratio test for related sparse signals.

Authors:  Ernst C Wit; David J G Bakewell
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Integrating genetic and gene expression evidence into genome-wide association analysis of gene sets.

Authors:  Qing Xiong; Nicola Ancona; Elizabeth R Hauser; Sayan Mukherjee; Terrence S Furey
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  A hypothesis test for equality of bayesian network models.

Authors:  Anthony Almudevar
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2010-10-12

4.  A multivariate approach for integrating genome-wide expression data and biological knowledge.

Authors:  Sek Won Kong; William T Pu; Peter J Park
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Gene-set analysis and reduction.

Authors:  Irina Dinu; John D Potter; Thomas Mueller; Qi Liu; Adeniyi J Adewale; Gian S Jhangri; Gunilla Einecke; Konrad S Famulski; Philip Halloran; Yutaka Yasui
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  Connectedness of PPI network neighborhoods identifies regulatory hub proteins.

Authors:  Andrew D Fox; Benjamin J Hescott; Anselm C Blumer; Donna K Slonim
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  A network-based gene-weighting approach for pathway analysis.

Authors:  Zhaoyuan Fang; Weidong Tian; Hongbin Ji
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 25.617

8.  A biological evaluation of six gene set analysis methods for identification of differentially expressed pathways in microarray data.

Authors:  Irina Dinu; Qi Liu; John D Potter; Adeniyi J Adewale; Gian S Jhangri; Thomas Mueller; Gunilla Einecke; Konrad Famulsky; Philip Halloran; Yutaka Yasui
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2008-06-20

9.  Identifying gene interaction enrichment for gene expression data.

Authors:  Jigang Zhang; Jian Li; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Association between a prognostic gene signature and functional gene sets.

Authors:  Manuela Hummel; Klaus H Metzeler; Christian Buske; Stefan K Bohlander; Ulrich Mansmann
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2008-09-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.