Literature DB >> 16113595

Sunscreens - which and what for?

T Maier1, H C Korting.   

Abstract

It is well established that sun exposure is the main cause for the development of skin cancer. Chronic continuous UV radiation is believed to induce malignant melanoma, whereas intermittent high-dose UV exposure contributes to the occurrence of actinic keratosis as precursor lesions of squamous cell carcinoma as well as basal cell carcinoma. Not only photocarcinogenesis but also the mechanisms of photoaging have recently become apparent. In this respect the use of sunscreens seemed to prove to be more and more important and popular within the last decades. However, there is still inconsistency about the usefulness of sunscreens. Several studies show that inadequate use and incomplete UV spectrum efficacy may compromise protection more than previously expected. The sunscreen market is crowded by numerous products. Inorganic sunscreens such as zinc oxide and titanium oxide have a wide spectral range of activity compared to most of the organic sunscreen products. It is not uncommon for organic sunscreens to cause photocontact allergy, but their cosmetic acceptability is still superior to the one given by inorganic sunscreens. Recently, modern galenic approaches such as micronization and encapsulation allow the development of high-quality inorganic sunscreens. The potential systemic toxicity of organic sunscreens has lately primarily been discussed controversially in public, and several studies show contradictory results. Although a matter of debate, at present the sun protection factor (SPF) is the most reliable information for the consumer as a measure of sunscreen filter efficacy. In this context additional tests have been introduced for the evaluation of not only the protective effect against erythema but also protection against UV-induced immunological and mutational effects. Recently, combinations of UV filters with agents active in DNA repair have been introduced in order to improve photoprotection. This article reviews the efficacy of sunscreens in the prevention of epithelial and nonepithelial skin cancer, the effect on immunosuppression and the value of the SPF as well as new developments on the sunscreen market. Copyright 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16113595     DOI: 10.1159/000087606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skin Pharmacol Physiol        ISSN: 1660-5527            Impact factor:   3.479


  18 in total

1.  [Skin aging].

Authors:  E Kohl; M Landthaler; R-M Szeimies
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  The Importance of Medicinal Chemistry Knowledge in the Clinical Pharmacist's Education.

Authors:  João Paulo S Fernandes
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Comparative analysis of the relative potential of silver, Zinc-oxide and titanium-dioxide nanoparticles against UVB-induced DNA damage for the prevention of skin carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Nikhil Tyagi; Sanjeev K Srivastava; Sumit Arora; Yousef Omar; Zohaib Mohammad Ijaz; Ahmed Al-Ghadhban; Sachin K Deshmukh; James E Carter; Ajay P Singh; Seema Singh
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 4.  Vitamin D in cutaneous carcinogenesis: part I.

Authors:  Jean Y Tang; Teresa Fu; Christopher Lau; Dennis H Oh; Daniel D Bikle; Maryam M Asgari
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Couples' urinary concentrations of benzophenone-type ultraviolet filters and the secondary sex ratio.

Authors:  Jisuk Bae; Sungduk Kim; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  [Modern light protection from the view of occupational dermatology].

Authors:  H F Merk; J Baratli
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 7.  [Evidence-based cosmetics: concepts and applications in photoaging of the skin and xerosis].

Authors:  Tatjana Pavicic; Stephanie Steckmeier; Martina Kerscher; Hans Christian Korting
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Thermal decomposition of nano-enabled thermoplastics: Possible environmental health and safety implications.

Authors:  Georgios A Sotiriou; Dilpreet Singh; Fang Zhang; Marie-Cecile G Chalbot; Eleanor Spielman-Sun; Lutz Hoering; Ilias G Kavouras; Gregory V Lowry; Wendel Wohlleben; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 10.588

9.  In vitro genotoxic effects of ZnO nanomaterials in human peripheral lymphocytes.

Authors:  Duygu Gümüş; Ahmet Ali Berber; Kezban Ada; Hüseyin Aksoy
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 10.  Visible light. Part II: Photoprotection against visible and ultraviolet light.

Authors:  Amaris N Geisler; Evan Austin; Julie Nguyen; Iltefat Hamzavi; Jared Jagdeo; Henry W Lim
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 11.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.