Literature DB >> 16113453

Drug delivery devices: issues in drug development.

Peter R Byron1.   

Abstract

New techniques for delivery of drugs by inhalation are discussed in this article. Devices that promise to improve the efficiency of lung delivery are described along with some of the regulatory challenges faced by their development scientists. Although high delivery efficiencies are possible, such devices are expensive to develop and may only be feasible in the event that they are partnered with drugs whose therapeutic and economic value is truly enhanced by the effort invested in the process. Appropriate devices must also be selected after paying careful attention to the physicochemical and dosing demands associated with the drug substance to be inhaled. Even newly launched commercial products display large variations in dose delivery to the lung, in spite of increased global efforts to regulate and ensure the uniformity of delivered doses and their aerosol size distributions; this because of variations in the inspiratory maneuvers used by patients and the lack of control exercised over these maneuvers by most new inhalers. Sophisticated electromechanical techniques are discussed as possible ways of overcoming some of the common difficulties associated with ensuring reproducibility of dose and drug delivery to the lung.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16113453     DOI: 10.1513/pats.200403-023MS

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc        ISSN: 1546-3222


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of enhanced condensational growth (ECG) for controlled respiratory drug delivery in a mouth-throat and upper tracheobronchial model.

Authors:  Michael Hindle; P Worth Longest
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Comparing MDI and DPI aerosol deposition using in vitro experiments and a new stochastic individual path (SIP) model of the conducting airways.

Authors:  P Worth Longest; Geng Tian; Ross L Walenga; Michael Hindle
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Effects of device and formulation on in vitro performance of dry powder inhalers.

Authors:  Wallace P Adams; Sau L Lee; Robert Plourde; Robert A Lionberger; Craig M Bertha; William H Doub; Jean-Marc Bovet; Anthony J Hickey
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  Devices for Improved Delivery of Nebulized Pharmaceutical Aerosols to the Lungs.

Authors:  Worth Longest; Benjamin Spence; Michael Hindle
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.849

Review 5.  Whether a novel drug delivery system can overcome the problem of biofilms in respiratory diseases?

Authors:  Kamal Dua; Shakti D Shukla; Rakesh K Tekade; Philip M Hansbro
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.617

6.  Differences in Particle Deposition Between Members of Imaging-Based Asthma Clusters.

Authors:  Jiwoong Choi; Lawrence J LeBlanc; Sanghun Choi; Babak Haghighi; Eric A Hoffman; Patrick O'Shaughnessy; Sally E Wenzel; Mario Castro; Sean Fain; Nizar Jarjour; Mark L Schiebler; Loren Denlinger; Renishkumar Delvadia; Ross Walenga; Andrew Babiskin; Ching-Long Lin
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 2.849

7.  Targeting aerosol deposition to and within the lung airways using excipient enhanced growth.

Authors:  Geng Tian; P Worth Longest; Xiang Li; Michael Hindle
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.849

8.  Performance of combination drug and hygroscopic excipient submicrometer particles from a softmist inhaler in a characteristic model of the airways.

Authors:  P Worth Longest; Geng Tian; Xiang Li; Yoen-Ju Son; Michael Hindle
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  CFD simulations of enhanced condensational growth (ECG) applied to respiratory drug delivery with comparisons to in vitro data.

Authors:  P Worth Longest; Michael Hindle
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.433

10.  Aerodynamic factors responsible for the deaggregation of carrier-free drug powders to form micrometer and submicrometer aerosols.

Authors:  P Worth Longest; Yoen-Ju Son; Landon Holbrook; Michael Hindle
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 4.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.