Literature DB >> 1611330

Potential for cadaveric organ retrieval in New South Wales.

A D Hibberd1, I Y Pearson, C J McCosker, J R Chapman, G J Macdonald, J F Thompson, D L O'Connell, P J Mohacsi, M P McLoughlin, P M Spratt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To measure the potential for cadaver organ retrieval in New South Wales and to determine the reasons for potential donors failing to become actual donors.
DESIGN: Prospective audit of all patients dying in five hospitals in New South Wales between 1 December 1989 and 30 November 1990; quality assurance of the data by independent medical specialist and if disagreement by study committee. PATIENTS: 2879 patients (100% of all deaths) yielding 364 patients with coma and 181 potential donors. OUTCOME MEASURES: Realistic medically suitable potential donor rate, missed potential donor rate, rate of potential donors with permission refused, donor rate, reasons for realistic medically suitable potential donors failing to become actual donors.
RESULTS: 2879 deaths yielded 73 medically suitable potential donors, resulting in 19 actual donors, 30 missed potential donors, 19 potential donors with permission refused, and five in whom adequate resuscitation failed. The most common reason for a potential donor failing to become an actual donor was a decision by the senior medical practitioner to withdraw or not to institute ventilatory or haemodynamic support (26/73). The second major obstacle was refusal of permission by the next of kin (17/73). Assuming that the potential donor rate was that implied by the observed donor rate (13/million population/year) the projected missed potential donor rate was 9/million population/year (95% confidence interval 4 to 15) and the projected rate of potential donors with permission refused was 13/million population/year (95% confidence interval 5 to 22). Assuming that the rate of potential donors in the study hospitals was the same as in the other New South Wales hospitals, the projected donor rate for New South Wales was 18/million population/year (10 to 26); the projected missed potential donor rate was 15/million population/year (7 to 23); and the projected rate of potential donors with permission refused was 18/million population/year (10 to 27).
CONCLUSIONS: The donor rate could be increased 70%-80% by overcoming the reluctance of medical practitioners to resuscitate missed potential donors and increased further by gaining permission for organ retrieval from the next of kin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1611330      PMCID: PMC1882046          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6838.1339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  7 in total

1.  Potential availability of cadaver organs for transplantation.

Authors:  M A Salih; I Harvey; S Frankel; D J Coupe; M Webb; H A Cripps
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-05-04

2.  Brain death and organ donation in a neurosurgical unit: audit of recent practice.

Authors:  D Gentleman; J Easton; B Jennett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-11-24

3.  Time to end softly softly approach on harvesting organs for transplantation.

Authors:  G D Chisholm
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-05-21

4.  Organ donation from intensive care units in England.

Authors:  S M Gore; C J Hinds; A J Rutherford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-11-11

5.  Cadaver nephrectomy: an operation on the donor's family.

Authors:  J B Morton; D R Leonard
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-01-27

6.  Protocol for increasing organ donation after cerebrovascular deaths in a district general hospital.

Authors:  T G Feest; H N Riad; C H Collins; M G Golby; A J Nicholls; S N Hamad
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-05-12       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Availability of transplantable organs from brain stem dead donors in intensive care units.

Authors:  S M Gore; R M Taylor; J Wallwork
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-01-19
  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Reanimation: overcoming objections and obstacles to organ retrieval from non-heart-beating cadaver donors.

Authors:  R D Orr; S R Gundry; L L Bailey
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Organ donation after paracetamol overdose.

Authors:  S Jackson; P Nightingale; M P Shelly
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-13

3.  Comparing Deceased Organ Donation Performance in Two Countries that Use Different Metrics: Comparing Apples With Apples.

Authors:  Luke Milross; Chloe Brown; Laura Gladkis; Kylie Downes; Melissa Goodwin; Susanna Madden; Mark McDonald; Lucinda Barry; Helen Opdam; Alex Manara; Dale Gardiner
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.842

4.  In defense of the reverence of all life: Heideggerean dissolution of the ethical challenges of organ donation after circulatory determination of death.

Authors:  D J Isch
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-05-02

5.  Identifying the potential organ donor: an audit of hospital deaths.

Authors:  Helen Ingrid Opdam; William Silvester
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-13       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Transplantation for chronic pulmonary disease: referral and outcome in Northern Ireland, 1986-1990.

Authors:  P T Reid; J MacMahon
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1995-04

7.  Assessment of Restored Kidney Transplantation Including the Use of Wider Criteria for Accepting Renal Donors After Cancer Excision.

Authors:  Philip Sprott; Adrian D Hibberd; Munish K Heer; Paul R Trevillian; David A Clark; David W Johnson; Christopher Oldmeadow; Simon Chiu; John R Attia
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2019-10-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.