Literature DB >> 16110934

Quantifying responsiveness of quality of life measures without an external criterion.

Guang Yong Zou1.   

Abstract

The responsiveness of a quality of life measure has received considerable attention in the literature. A two time-point (pre-/post-) study design is usually adopted to evaluate this property when a gold standard is not available. Among many indices, Cohen's effect size and the standardized response mean (SRM) are usually computed. To interpret the results, researchers commonly appeal to an arbitrary criterion for both indices even though they are different by definition. In this paper, we demonstrate their close algebraic relationship and conceptual differences, showing that only the SRM is necessary to quantify responsiveness. To facilitate interpretation, we transform the SRM to the 'probability of change' with a value of 0.5 denoting null responsiveness and 1.0 perfect responsiveness. Simple confidence interval procedures are provided and evaluated. We also discuss the possibility of applying the results to the analysis of data from a two independent groups pre-/post- design. Two examples are provided.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16110934     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-004-0027-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  22 in total

Review 1.  Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.

Authors:  J A Husted; R J Cook; V T Farewell; D D Gladman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Number needed to treat (NNT): estimation of a measure of clinical benefit.

Authors:  S D Walter
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation.

Authors:  C B Terwee; F W Dekker; W M Wiersinga; M F Prummel; P M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Assessing meaningful change in quality of life over time: a users' guide for clinicians.

Authors:  Mirjam A G Sprangers; Carol M Moinpour; Timothy J Moynihan; Donald L Patrick; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Ross D Crosby; Ronette L Kolotkin; G Rhys Williams
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Confidence limits made easy: interval estimation using a substitution method.

Authors:  L E Daly
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  D E Beaton; S Hogg-Johnson; C Bombardier
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  R A Deyo; R M Centor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

9.  Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments.

Authors:  G Guyatt; S Walter; G Norman
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

10.  Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status.

Authors:  L E Kazis; J J Anderson; R F Meenan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  15 in total

1.  The minimal important difference in the 6-minute walk test for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Stephen C Mathai; Milo A Puhan; Diana Lam; Robert A Wise
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Responsiveness to change [corrected] due to supportive-expressive group therapy, improvement in mood and disease progression in women with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Julie Lemieux; Dorcas E Beaton; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Louise J Bordeleau; Jon Hunter; Pamela J Goodwin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  A new indicator for the measurement of change with ordinal scores.

Authors:  Mario Luiz Pinto Ferreira; Renan Moritz V R Almeida; Ronir Raggio Luiz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Responsiveness of Endoscopic Indices of Disease Activity for Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  Reena Khanna; GuangYong Zou; Larry Stitt; Brian G Feagan; William J Sandborn; Paul Rutgeerts; John W D McDonald; Elena Dubcenco; Ronald Fogel; Remo Panaccione; Vipul Jairath; Sigrid Nelson; Lisa M Shackelton; Bidan Huang; Qian Zhou; Anne M Robinson; Barrett G Levesque; Geert D'Haens
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences after cholecystectomy: GIQLI versus SF-36.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Hao-Hsien Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; Herng-Chia Chiu; Yih-Huei Uen; King-Teh Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Responsiveness and minimal important differences after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Je-Ken Chang; Chi-Yin Wong; Jun-Wen Wang; Yuan-Kun Tu; Herng-Chia Chiu; King-Teh Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Responsiveness of the Eating Disorders Quality of Life Scale (EDQLS) in a longitudinal multi-site sample.

Authors:  Carol E Adair; Gisele C Marcoux; Theanna F Bischoff; Brian S Cram; Carol J Ewashen; Jorge Pinzon; Joanne L Gusella; Josie Geller; Yvette Scattolon; Patricia Fergusson; Lisa Styles; Krista E Brown
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  The Minimal Important Difference in Borg Dyspnea Score in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Rubina M Khair; Chisom Nwaneri; Rachel L Damico; Todd Kolb; Paul M Hassoun; Stephen C Mathai
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-06

Review 9.  Endoscopic scoring indices for evaluation of disease activity in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Reena Khanna; Sigrid A Nelson; Brian G Feagan; Geert D'Haens; William J Sandborn; G Y Zou; John K MacDonald; Claire E Parker; Vipul Jairath; Barrett G Levesque
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-08

10.  The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provided valid, reliable, and responsive score estimates of functioning and well-being during the first year of recovery from stroke.

Authors:  Patrick J Doyle; Malcolm R McNeil; James E Bost; Katherine B Ross; Julie L Wambaugh; William D Hula; Joseph M Mikolic
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.