Literature DB >> 16110851

Evaluation of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) versus propanolol plus isosorbide mononitrate/nadolol (ISMN) in the prevention of variceal rebleeding: comparison of cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients.

Shiv K Sarin1, Manav Wadhawan, Rajesh Gupta, Hansa Shahi.   

Abstract

Both EVL and drug therapy are effective in the prevention of variceal rebleeding. Comparisons between the two modalities are few, and only in cirrhotics. This prospective randomized controlled trial compared EVL with drug therapy (propranolol + ISMN) in the prevention of rebleeds from esophageal varices in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) patients. One hundred thirty-seven variceal bleeders were randomized to EVL (Group I; n = 71) or drug therapy (Group II; n = 66). In Group I, EVL was done every 2 weeks till obliteration of varices. In Group II, propranolol (dose sufficient to reduce heart rate to 55 bpm/maximum tolerated dose) and ISMN (incremental dose up to 20 mg BD) were administered. Group I and II patients had comparable baseline characteristics, follow-up (12.4 vs. 11.1 months), cirrhotics and noncirrhotics [50(70.4%) and 21(29.6%) vs. 51(77.3%) and 15(22.7%)] and frequency of Child's A (35 vs. 27), B (26 vs. 28), and C (9 vs. 11). The mean daily dose was 109 +/- 46 mg propranolol and 34 +/- 11 mg ISMN and was comparable in cirrhotic and NCPH patients. Upper GI bleeds occurred in 10 patients in Group I (5 from esophageal varices) and in 18 patients in Group II (15 from esophageal varices) (P = 0.06). The actuarial probability of rebleeding from esophageal varices at 24 months was 22% in Group I and 37% in Group II (P = 0.02). The probability of bleed was significantly higher in Child's C compared to Child's A/B cirrhotics (P = 0.02). On subgroup analysis, in NCPH patients, the actuarial probability of bleed at 24 months was significantly lower in Group I compared to Group II (25% vs 37%; P = 0.01). In cirrhotics, there was no difference in the probability of rebleeding between patients in Group I and those in Group II (P = 0.74). In Group II, 25.7% patients had adverse effects of drug therapy and 9% patients had to stop propranolol due to serious adverse effects, none required stopping ISMN. There were 10 deaths, 6 in Group I (bleed related, 1) and 4 in Group II (bleed related, 1); the actuarial probability of survival was comparable (P = 0.39). EVL and combination therapy are equally effective in the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients. EVL is more effective than drug therapy in the prevention of rebleeds in patients with NCPH and, hence, recommended. However, in view of the small number of NCPH patients, further studies are needed before this can be stated conclusively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16110851     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-005-2877-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  25 in total

1.  Isosorbide mononitrate and propranolol compared with propranolol alone for the prevention of variceal rebleeding.

Authors:  J Gournay; C Masliah; T Martin; D Perrin; J P Galmiche
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Predictors of variceal bleeding: an analysis of clinical, endoscopic, and haemodynamic variables, with special reference to intravariceal pressure.

Authors:  S K Sarin; K R Sundaram; R K Ahuja
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Effect of propranolol on oesophageal variceal pressure in a patient with extrahepatic portal obstruction.

Authors:  N Toba; I Honjou; M Kadohara; C Hirayama
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.029

4.  Nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate compared with sclerotherapy for the prevention of variceal rebleeding.

Authors:  C Villanueva; J Balanzó; M T Novella; G Soriano; S Sáinz; X Torras; X Cussó; C Guarner; F Vilardell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-06-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The treatment of portal hypertension: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  G D'Amico; L Pagliaro; J Bosch
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Endoscopic ligation compared with sclerotherapy for treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Laine; D Cook
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Ammonia tolerance in the diagnosis of esophageal varices. A comparison of endoscopic, radiologic, and biochemical techniques.

Authors:  H O Conn
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1967-09

8.  Endoscopic ligation compared with sclerotherapy for the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices.

Authors:  L Laine; H M el-Newihi; B Migikovsky; R Sloane; F Garcia
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  "A La Carte" treatment of portal hypertension: Adapting medical therapy to hemodynamic response for the prevention of bleeding.

Authors:  Christophe Bureau; Jean-Marie Péron; Laurent Alric; Joséphine Morales; Jérôme Sanchez; Karl Barange; Jean-Louis Payen; Jean-Pierre Vinel
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  A randomized, controlled trial of medical therapy versus endoscopic ligation for the prevention of variceal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  D Patch; C A Sabin; J Goulis; G Gerunda; L Greenslade; C Merkel; A K Burroughs
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of endoscopic therapy for esophageal varices.

Authors:  G V Stiegmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Clinical characteristics of idiopathic portal hypertension.

Authors:  Ozgur Harmanci; Yusuf Bayraktar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Endoscopic band ligation versus pharmacological therapy for variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lan Li; Chaohui Yu; Youming Li
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 4.  The current clinical aspects of idiopathic portal hypertension.

Authors:  Tomohiro Tanaka; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2013-08

Review 5.  Endoscopic treatments for portal hypertension.

Authors:  Gin-Ho Lo
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 6.047

6.  Results of a new method to stop acute bleeding from esophageal varices: implantation of a self-expanding stent.

Authors:  J Zehetner; A Shamiyeh; W Wayand; R Hubmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Variceal bleeding : pharmacological treatment and prophylactic strategies.

Authors:  Cándid Villanueva; Joaquim Balanzó
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Idiopathic Non-Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension and Porto-Sinusoidal Vascular Disease: Review of Current Data.

Authors:  Michel Kmeid; Xiuli Liu; Samuel Ballentine; Hwajeong Lee
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2021-04-21

9.  Secondary prevention of variceal bleeding in adults with previous oesophageal variceal bleeding due to decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Corina Plaz Torres; Lawrence Mj Best; Suzanne C Freeman; Danielle Roberts; Nicola J Cooper; Alex J Sutton; Davide Roccarina; Amine Benmassaoud; Laura Iogna Prat; Norman R Williams; Mario Csenar; Dominic Fritche; Tanjia Begum; Sivapatham Arunan; Maxine Tapp; Elisabeth Jane Milne; Chavdar S Pavlov; Brian R Davidson; Emmanuel Tsochatzis; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-30

10.  Clinical features and treatment outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Yeon Seok Seo; Youn Ho Kim; Sang Hoon Ahn; Sang Kyun Yu; Soon Koo Baik; Sung Kyu Choi; Jeong Heo; Taeho Hahn; Tae Woo Yoo; Se Hyun Cho; Hyun Woong Lee; Ju Hyun Kim; Mong Cho; Sang Hoon Park; Byung Ik Kim; Kwang Hyub Han; Soon Ho Um
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.