Literature DB >> 16110769

Side effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation biased task performance in a cognitive neuroscience study.

Birgit Abler1, Henrik Walter, Arthur Wunderlich, Jo Grothe, Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Manfred Spitzer, Uwe Herwig.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly used as a research tool for functional brain mapping in cognitive neuroscience. Despite being mostly tolerable, side effects of TMS could influence task performance in behavioural TMS studies. In order to test this issue, healthy subjects assessed the discomfort caused by the stimulation during a verbal working memory task. We investigated the relation between subjective disturbance and task performance. Subjects were stimulated during the delay period of a delayed-match-to-sample task above cortical areas that had been identified before to be involved in working memory. Task performance and subjective disturbance due to side effects were monitored. The subjects' grade of discomfort correlated with the error rates: the higher the discomfort, the more errors were made. Conclusively, TMS side effects may bias task performance in cognitive neuroscience studies and may thereby lead to misinterpretation of results. We emphasize the importance of controlling side effects of the stimulation as a source of biasing effects in TMS studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16110769     DOI: 10.1007/s10548-005-6028-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  17 in total

1.  Diminishing parochialism in intergroup conflict by disrupting the right temporo-parietal junction.

Authors:  Thomas Baumgartner; Bastian Schiller; Jörg Rieskamp; Lorena R R Gianotti; Daria Knoch
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Non-invasive neuromodulation using rTMS and the electromagnetic-perceptive gene (EPG) facilitates plasticity after nerve injury.

Authors:  Carolina Cywiak; Ryan C Ashbaugh; Abigael C Metto; Lalita Udpa; Chunqi Qian; Assaf A Gilad; Mark Reimers; Ming Zhong; Galit Pelled
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Causal evidence supporting functional dissociation of verbal and spatial working memory in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Peter J Fried; Richard J Rushmore; Mark B Moss; Antoni Valero-Cabré; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 4.  Effects of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognitive processing: A meta-analysis and recommendations for future studies.

Authors:  Lysianne Beynel; Lawrence G Appelbaum; Bruce Luber; Courtney A Crowell; Susan A Hilbig; Wesley Lim; Duy Nguyen; Nicolas A Chrapliwy; Simon W Davis; Roberto Cabeza; Sarah H Lisanby; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Disrupting the prefrontal cortex diminishes the human ability to build a good reputation.

Authors:  Daria Knoch; Frédéric Schneider; Daniel Schunk; Martin Hohmann; Ernst Fehr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Effects of 10 Hz rTMS on the neural efficiency of working memory.

Authors:  Gilbert Preston; Erik Anderson; Claudio Silva; Terry Goldberg; Eric M Wassermann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Double-blind disruption of right inferior frontal cortex with TMS reduces right frontal beta power for action stopping.

Authors:  Kelsey K Sundby; Sumitash Jana; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Image-guided transcranial focused ultrasound stimulates human primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Wonhye Lee; Hyungmin Kim; Yujin Jung; In-Uk Song; Yong An Chung; Seung-Schik Yoo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Pre-stimulus sham TMS facilitates target detection.

Authors:  Felix Duecker; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Time- and task-dependent non-neural effects of real and sham TMS.

Authors:  Felix Duecker; Tom A de Graaf; Christianne Jacobs; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.