Literature DB >> 16110580

SARS vaccine protective in mice.

Konrad Stadler, Anjeanette Roberts, Stephan Becker, Leatrice Vogel, Markus Eickmann, Larissa Kolesnikova, Hans-Dieter Klenk, Brian Murphy, Rino Rappuoli, Sergio Abrignani, Kanta Subbarao.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16110580      PMCID: PMC3320494          DOI: 10.3201/eid1108.041003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Less than a year after the identification of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) (1), 3 independent laboratories reported protection from SARS-CoV challenge in animal models using a DNA vaccine or recombinant forms of the modified vaccinia Ankara or a parainfluenza virus, encoding the spike gene (2–4). Their protective efficacies are encouraging because they provide proof that a SARS-CoV vaccine is feasible. However, vaccines based on those technologies are not licensed for human use, and recommendation and licensing will likely take many years. We have developed an inactivated virus vaccine that induces neutralizing antibodies and protects against SARS-CoV challenge. The vaccine was produced as described elsewhere (5). Briefly, the SARS-CoV (strain FRA, GenBank accession no. AY310120) was grown in Vero cells, inactivated with β-propiolactone (BPL), and complete inactivation was confirmed by 2 consecutive passages on Vero cells. Inactivated virus was purified by column chromatography followed by sucrose gradient centrifugation. The fraction containing virus was dialyzed against phosphate-buffered saline pH 7.2, and total protein content was determined by using the Micro BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA). Immunogenicity of the vaccine was tested by immunizing BALB/c mice at 0, 2, and 4 weeks with 5 μg of inactivated virus combined with the adjuvant MF59, an oil squalene-in-water emulsion (6) approved for human use in Europe for an influenza vaccine. Ten days after the third immunization, serum samples were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV spike protein–specific antibodies by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and high titers (1–3 × 104) of anti-SARS-CoV spike immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibodies were detected. IgG subclass determination indicated a predominant Th2-type immune response similar to that observed in BALB/c mice vaccinated with a UV-inactivated SARS-CoV plus alum (7). Efficacy of the inactivated virus vaccine was also assessed in a BALB/c mouse model of SARS-CoV infection (8). Animal studies were approved by the National Institutes of Health Animal Care and Use Committee and were conducted in an animal biosafety level 3 facility. SARS-CoV replicates in the respiratory tract of BALB/c mice following intranasal infection with 104 50% tissue culture infectious doses (TCID50) of virus. Generally, virus titers peak within 2 days after infection and are cleared within 7 days (8). BALB/c mice were immunized at 0, 2, and 4 weeks with 5 μg of BPL-inactivated SARS virus with or without the MF59 adjuvant. Mice were also immunized with 4 different control preparations: phosphate-buffered saline, adjuvant MF59 alone, and 5 μg of BPL inactivated influenza A virus vaccine with or without MF59. Serum samples were collected 2 weeks after each dose, and assayed for their ability to neutralize SARS-CoV (8). After 2 vaccine doses, SARS-CoV neutralizing antibodies were detected only in the group of mice immunized with the BPL-inactivated SARS virus vaccine plus MF59 adjuvant (1:91). Two weeks after the third dose, the BPL-inactivated SARS virus vaccine without MF59 induced neutralizing titers of 1:64, while the adjuvanted vaccine elicited neutralizing titers >1:600 (Table).
Table

Immunogenicity and efficacy of β-propiolactone (BPL)–inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) vaccine in mice against subsequent challenge with live SARS-CoV

Immunogen*Neutralization titer†
Virus replication upon challenge‡
Lungs
Nasal turbinates
2 wk post 1st dose2 wk post 2nd dose2 wk post 3rd doseNo. infected/ no. testedMean (± SE) virus titer§No. infected/ no. testedMean (± SE) virus titer§
PBS<1:8<1:8<1:84/46.3 ± 0.33/42.8 ± 0.35
MF59<1:8<1:8<1:84/46.1 ± 0.133/43.0 ± 0.58
Influenza A (5 μg)<1:8<1:8<1:84/46.3 ± 0.073/42.9 ± 0.36
Influenza A (5 μg) + MF59<1:8<1:8<1:84/46.0 ± 0.194/43.0 ± 0.11
BPL-SARS-CoV (5 μg)<1:8<1:81:641/42.0 ± 0.0¶#0/4≤1.8 ± 0**††
BPL-SARS-CoV (5 μg) + MF59<1:81:911:6450/4≤1.5 ± 0¶**0/4≤1.8 ± 0**††

*The indicated immunogens or control preparations were administered to mice by subcutaneous injection on 3 occasions 2 weeks apart; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
†Neutralization titers were determined as described (8).
‡Mice were challenged with 104 50% tissue culture infectious doses (TCID50) SARS-CoV intranasally.
§Virus titers are expressed as log10 TCID50/g of tissue.
¶p<0.00001 in a 2-tailed Student t test, compared to titers seen in mice that were immunized with PBS.
#Indicates the titer of a single animal. The remaining 3 mice had no detectable levels of virus.
**Virus not detected; the lower limit of detection of infectious virus was 1.5 log10 TCID50/g in a 10% wt/vol suspension of lung homogenate and 1.8 log10 TCID50/g in a 5% wt/vol suspension of nasal turbinates.
††p = 0.025 in a 2-tailed Student t test, compared to titers seen in mice that were immunized with PBS.

*The indicated immunogens or control preparations were administered to mice by subcutaneous injection on 3 occasions 2 weeks apart; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
†Neutralization titers were determined as described (8).
‡Mice were challenged with 104 50% tissue culture infectious doses (TCID50) SARS-CoV intranasally.
§Virus titers are expressed as log10 TCID50/g of tissue.
¶p<0.00001 in a 2-tailed Student t test, compared to titers seen in mice that were immunized with PBS.
#Indicates the titer of a single animal. The remaining 3 mice had no detectable levels of virus.
**Virus not detected; the lower limit of detection of infectious virus was 1.5 log10 TCID50/g in a 10% wt/vol suspension of lung homogenate and 1.8 log10 TCID50/g in a 5% wt/vol suspension of nasal turbinates.
††p = 0.025 in a 2-tailed Student t test, compared to titers seen in mice that were immunized with PBS. Mice were challenged intranasally at this point with 104 TCID50 SARS-CoV (Urbani strain, GenBank accession no. AY278741). Nasal turbinates and lung tissues were analyzed for infectious virus 2 days later (Table). SARS-CoV titers in mice from the control groups were ≈106 TCID50 virus/g of lung tissue and ≈103 TCID50 virus/g of nasal turbinate tissue. Complete protection from virus replication was observed in mice that received the MF59 adjuvanted SARS-CoV vaccine. Immunization with the nonadjuvanted vaccine resulted in complete protection of the upper respiratory tract and a significant reduction (30,000-fold) of viral titers in the lower respiratory tract compared to the control groups. The incomplete protection of this group was attributed to a single animal that contained detectable infectious virus in the lung. Accelerated or enhanced virus replication or disease in immunized persons is a concern in developing any vaccine. This may be particularly true for SARS-CoV vaccines since adverse effects have been reported for one animal coronavirus vaccine, feline infectious peritonitis virus (9). Additionally, some in vitro experiments were performed with pseudotyped lentiviruses that expressed the spike glycoprotein derived from SARS-like virus isolated from civets. In these experiments, the presence of antibodies that neutralized most human isolates of SARS-CoV demonstrated enhanced entry into renal epithelial cells (10). In our studies, we did not find enhanced virus replication in the respiratory tract of vaccinated mice upon SARS-CoV challenge. However, since mice are a model of SARS-CoV infection but not disease, the issue of disease enhancement will have to be carefully evaluated if and when an appropriate animal model in which this phenomenon can be demonstrated becomes available. In summary, an inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine, produced with a technology that has a safety record established by immunizing hundreds of millions of persons, protects mice from challenge with SARS-CoV. The vaccine adjuvanted with MF59 elicits neutralizing antibodies (titer 1:91) after only 2 doses. We conclude that the vaccine described here has desirable properties, and our data support further development and plans for clinical trials.
  10 in total

1.  Early death after feline infectious peritonitis virus challenge due to recombinant vaccinia virus immunization.

Authors:  H Vennema; R J de Groot; D A Harbour; M Dalderup; T Gruffydd-Jones; M C Horzinek; W J Spaan
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Evasion of antibody neutralization in emerging severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses.

Authors:  Zhi-yong Yang; Heidi C Werner; Wing-pui Kong; Kwanyee Leung; Elisabetta Traggiai; Antonio Lanzavecchia; Gary J Nabel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  MF59-adjuvanted vaccines: increased immunogenicity with an optimal safety profile.

Authors:  Audino Podda; Giuseppe Del Giudice
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.217

4.  A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Thomas G Ksiazek; Dean Erdman; Cynthia S Goldsmith; Sherif R Zaki; Teresa Peret; Shannon Emery; Suxiang Tong; Carlo Urbani; James A Comer; Wilina Lim; Pierre E Rollin; Scott F Dowell; Ai-Ee Ling; Charles D Humphrey; Wun-Ju Shieh; Jeannette Guarner; Christopher D Paddock; Paul Rota; Barry Fields; Joseph DeRisi; Jyh-Yuan Yang; Nancy Cox; James M Hughes; James W LeDuc; William J Bellini; Larry J Anderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein expressed by attenuated vaccinia virus protectively immunizes mice.

Authors:  Himani Bisht; Anjeanette Roberts; Leatrice Vogel; Alexander Bukreyev; Peter L Collins; Brian R Murphy; Kanta Subbarao; Bernard Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Prior infection and passive transfer of neutralizing antibody prevent replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in the respiratory tract of mice.

Authors:  Kanta Subbarao; Josephine McAuliffe; Leatrice Vogel; Gary Fahle; Steven Fischer; Kathleen Tatti; Michelle Packard; Wun-Ju Shieh; Sherif Zaki; Brian Murphy
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Synthesis and characterization of a native, oligomeric form of recombinant severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike glycoprotein.

Authors:  Hyun Chul Song; Mi-Young Seo; Konrad Stadler; Byoung J Yoo; Qui-Lim Choo; Stephen R Coates; Yasushi Uematsu; Takashi Harada; Catherine E Greer; John M Polo; Piero Pileri; Markus Eickmann; Rino Rappuoli; Sergio Abrignani; Michael Houghton; Jang H Han
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  A DNA vaccine induces SARS coronavirus neutralization and protective immunity in mice.

Authors:  Zhi-Yong Yang; Wing-Pui Kong; Yue Huang; Anjeanette Roberts; Brian R Murphy; Kanta Subbarao; Gary J Nabel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  A subcutaneously injected UV-inactivated SARS coronavirus vaccine elicits systemic humoral immunity in mice.

Authors:  Naomi Takasuka; Hideki Fujii; Yoshimasa Takahashi; Masataka Kasai; Shigeru Morikawa; Shigeyuki Itamura; Koji Ishii; Masahiro Sakaguchi; Kazuo Ohnishi; Masamichi Ohshima; Shu-ichi Hashimoto; Takato Odagiri; Masato Tashiro; Hiroshi Yoshikura; Toshitada Takemori; Yasuko Tsunetsugu-Yokota
Journal:  Int Immunol       Date:  2004-08-16       Impact factor: 4.823

10.  Mucosal immunisation of African green monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) with an attenuated parainfluenza virus expressing the SARS coronavirus spike protein for the prevention of SARS.

Authors:  Alexander Bukreyev; Elaine W Lamirande; Ursula J Buchholz; Leatrice N Vogel; William R Elkins; Marisa St Claire; Brian R Murphy; Kanta Subbarao; Peter L Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  21 in total

Review 1.  Emerging respiratory viruses: challenges and vaccine strategies.

Authors:  Laura Gillim-Ross; Kanta Subbarao
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  The ORF7b protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is expressed in virus-infected cells and incorporated into SARS-CoV particles.

Authors:  Scott R Schaecher; Jason M Mackenzie; Andrew Pekosz
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Newcastle disease virus, a host range-restricted virus, as a vaccine vector for intranasal immunization against emerging pathogens.

Authors:  Joshua M DiNapoli; Alexander Kotelkin; Lijuan Yang; Subbiah Elankumaran; Brian R Murphy; Siba K Samal; Peter L Collins; Alexander Bukreyev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus as an agent of emerging and reemerging infection.

Authors:  Vincent C C Cheng; Susanna K P Lau; Patrick C Y Woo; Kwok Yung Yuen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Vaccine efficacy in senescent mice challenged with recombinant SARS-CoV bearing epidemic and zoonotic spike variants.

Authors:  Damon Deming; Timothy Sheahan; Mark Heise; Boyd Yount; Nancy Davis; Amy Sims; Mehul Suthar; Jack Harkema; Alan Whitmore; Raymond Pickles; Ande West; Eric Donaldson; Kristopher Curtis; Robert Johnston; Ralph Baric
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Recombinant receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV spike protein expressed in mammalian, insect and E. coli cells elicits potent neutralizing antibody and protective immunity.

Authors:  Lanying Du; Guangyu Zhao; Chris C S Chan; Shihui Sun; Min Chen; Zhonghua Liu; Hongxiang Guo; Yuxian He; Yusen Zhou; Bo-Jian Zheng; Shibo Jiang
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.616

Review 7.  Human coronaviruses: insights into environmental resistance and its influence on the development of new antiseptic strategies.

Authors:  Chloé Geller; Mihayl Varbanov; Raphaël E Duval
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 5.048

8.  Animal models and vaccines for SARS-CoV infection.

Authors:  Anjeanette Roberts; Elaine W Lamirande; Leatrice Vogel; Jadon P Jackson; Christopher D Paddock; Jeannette Guarner; Sherif R Zaki; Timothy Sheahan; Ralph Baric; Kanta Subbarao
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 3.303

Review 9.  From SARS to MERS, Thrusting Coronaviruses into the Spotlight.

Authors:  Zhiqi Song; Yanfeng Xu; Linlin Bao; Ling Zhang; Pin Yu; Yajin Qu; Hua Zhu; Wenjie Zhao; Yunlin Han; Chuan Qin
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 10.  SARS vaccines: where are we?

Authors:  Rachel L Roper; Kristina E Rehm
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.