Literature DB >> 16110103

Breast dose from magnification films in mammography.

J Law1.   

Abstract

In mammography, much attention has been given to estimating breast dose from exposures made in conventional "contact" geometry, but much less attention has been given to doses from magnification geometry. Estimation based on contact film dose is difficult because the grid is removed, the geometry is different, and calculation of scatter reaching the film is complex. In this paper, exposures of Perspex blocks of standard thickness to give the same film density in both geometries are compared on 20 X-ray sets of various designs with a nominal magnification 1.8. The ratio derived between doses in each geometry is 2.2+/-0.15, giving an average magnification film dose of 5.0+/-0.3 mGy.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16110103     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/52648102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  8 in total

1.  Can electronic zoom replace magnification in mammography? A comparative Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  M Koutalonis; H Delis; A Pascoal; G Spyrou; L Costaridou; G Panayiotakis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Three dimensional dose distribution comparison of simple and complex acquisition trajectories in dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Jainil P Shah; Steve D Mann; Randolph L McKinley; Martin P Tornai
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Characterization of microcalcification: can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?

Authors:  Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Eun Ju Son; Ji Hyun Youk; Seon Hyeong Choi; Mooyoung Han; Ki Keun Oh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Zooming method (x 2.0) of digital mammography vs digital magnification view (x 1.8) in full-field digital mammography for the diagnosis of microcalcifications.

Authors:  M J Kim; J H Youk; D R Kang; S H Choi; J Y Kwak; E J Son; E-K Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Digital magnification mammography with matched incident exposure: physical imaging properties and detectability of simulated microcalcifications.

Authors:  Nobukazu Tanaka; Kentaro Naka; Hiroko Fukushima; Junji Morishita; Fukai Toyofuku; Masafumi Ohki; Yoshiharu Higashida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-03-18

6.  Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Jane Lange; Jeroen J van den Broek; Christoph I Lee; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Dominique Ritley; Karla Kerlikowske; Joshua J Fenton; Joy Melnikow; Harry J de Koning; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Personalized estimates of radiation dose from dedicated breast CT in a diagnostic population and comparison with diagnostic mammography.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Linxi Shi; Andrew Karellas; Avice M O'Connell; David L Conover
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  A Micro CT Study in Patients with Breast Microcalcifications Using a Mathematical Algorithm to Assess 3D Structure.

Authors:  David Kenkel; Zsuzsanna Varga; Heike Heuer; Konstantin J Dedes; Nicole Berger; Lukas Filli; Andreas Boss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.