Literature DB >> 16108921

No association between partial depopulation and Campylobacter spp. colonization of Dutch broiler flocks.

A D Russa1, A Bouma, J C M Vernooij, W Jacobs-Reitsma, J A Stegeman.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine whether an association exists between partial depopulation of a flock and increased Campylobacter colonization in that flock. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Data from 1737 flocks of two Dutch integrators were used. Flocks that experienced partial depopulation were defined as 'exposed' and those that did not as 'nonexposed'. Multivariable modelling was accomplished with, in addition to 'exposure', the independent variables 'age of broilers at slaughter' and 'season' to adjust for possible confounding. The response variable was 'Campylobacter colonization'. The odds ratio (OR) for partial depopulation for integrator A was 0.8 [95% CI (0.4, 1.8)]; for integrator B the OR = 0.8 [95% CI (0.5, 1.3)]. Age and season were confounders: the difference in Campylobacter status between exposed and nonexposed flocks of integrator A could be explained by both variables; for integrator B, only season was associated with Campylobacter status.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant association between partial depopulation and an increased risk of Campylobacter colonization among broiler flocks at final depopulation. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study demonstrates that Campylobacter colonization in a broiler flock is not influenced by the partial depopulation of that flock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16108921     DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01751.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0266-8254            Impact factor:   2.858


  7 in total

Review 1.  Biosecurity-based interventions and strategies to reduce Campylobacter spp. on poultry farms.

Authors:  D G Newell; K T Elvers; D Dopfer; I Hansson; P Jones; S James; J Gittins; N J Stern; R Davies; I Connerton; D Pearson; G Salvat; V M Allen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Estimation of the Production Economic Consequences of Stopping Partial Depopulation in Broiler Production.

Authors:  Nunzio Sarnino; Anna Catharina Berge; Ilias Chantziaras; Jeroen Dewulf
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 3.  A Review of the Effect of Management Practices on Campylobacter Prevalence in Poultry Farms.

Authors:  Nompilo Sibanda; Aaron McKenna; Anne Richmond; Steven C Ricke; Todd Callaway; Alexandros Ch Stratakos; Ozan Gundogdu; Nicolae Corcionivoschi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  Mobile Poultry Processing Unit as a Resource for Small Poultry Farms: Planning and Economic Efficiency, Animal Welfare, Meat Quality and Sanitary Implications.

Authors:  Alice Cartoni Mancinelli; Alessandro Dal Bosco; Simona Mattioli; David Ranucci; Cesare Castellini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  The effect of partial depopulation on Campylobacter introduction in broiler houses.

Authors:  K Hertogs; M Heyndrickx; P Gelaude; L De Zutter; J Dewulf; G Rasschaert
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  A longitudinal study of Campylobacter distribution in a turkey production chain.

Authors:  Päivikki Perko-Mäkelä; Pauliina Isohanni; Marianne Katzav; Marianne Lund; Marja-Liisa Hänninen; Ulrike Lyhs
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 1.695

Review 7.  A systematic review characterizing on-farm sources of Campylobacter spp. for broiler chickens.

Authors:  Agnes Agunos; Lisa Waddell; David Léger; Eduardo Taboada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.