Literature DB >> 16108584

Isometric back extension endurance testing: reasons for test termination.

Annina Ropponen1, Laura E Gibbons, Tapio Videman, Michele C Battié.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
OBJECTIVE: The self-reported reasons for terminating isometric back extension endurance testing and their associations with test performance and other factors were investigated to gain insight into determinants of test performance.
BACKGROUND: Factors limiting isometric back extension endurance performance remain unclear. Better understanding the reasons for termination of isometric extension endurance testing could provide insights into what the test actually reflects. METHODS AND MEASURES: Lifetime work, leisure activities and back pain questionnaire data, isometric back extension endurance testing (holding time, as measured in seconds), and reasons for test termination were obtained for a population-based sample of 544 working-age men.
RESULTS: The most common reason for test termination was fatigue (62.5%), followed by pain in various parts of the lower extremities (12.6%) and back (3.2%). A history of daily low back pain over the prior 12 months and greater pain intensity of the worst back pain episode over the same period were associated with a greater likelihood of termination due to back pain. In a regression analysis, longer holding time was associated with stopping due to fatigue rather than low back pain, with a trend of 19 seconds (95% confidence interval [CI], -2-40) longer holding time. After controlling for low back pain history, those previously involved in competitive sports were 2.6 times more likely to stop due to pain. Those with a competitive sport history had 14 seconds (95% CI, 5-23) greater holding time than those without such a history.
CONCLUSIONS: Isometric back extension endurance testing is most commonly reported to be terminated due to muscle-related capacity as indicated by fatigue. Back pain is more likely to decrease performance time in men with a history of significant (frequent, intense) low back symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16108584     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.7.437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of different trunk endurance testing methods in college-aged individuals.

Authors:  Michael P Reiman; Amber D Krier; Julie A Nelson; Michael A Rogers; Zachariah O Stuke; Barbara S Smith
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-10

2.  Content Validity Index and Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of a New Muscle Strength/Endurance Test Battery for Swedish Soldiers.

Authors:  Helena Larsson; Matthias Tegern; Andreas Monnier; Jörgen Skoglund; Charlotte Helander; Emelie Persson; Christer Malm; Lisbet Broman; Ulrika Aasa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Screen-based media use clusters are related to other activity behaviours and health indicators in adolescents.

Authors:  Leon Straker; Anne Smith; Beth Hands; Tim Olds; Rebecca Abbott
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  The Reliability and Validity of Gluteal Endurance Measures (GEMs).

Authors:  B J Lehecka; Barbara S Smith; Todd Rundell; Thomas A Cappaert; Nils A Hakansson
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-12-02

5.  Effects of mechanical-bed massage on exercise-induced back fatigue in athletes.

Authors:  Houyong Zhong; Wichai Eungpinichpong; Xingze Wang; Uraiwon Chatchawan; Sawitri Wanpen; Orawan Buranruk
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-03-02

6.  Determining Physiological and Psychological Predictors of Time to Task Failure on a Virtual Reality Sørensen Test in Participants With and Without Recurrent Low Back Pain: Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Megan E Applegate; Christopher R France; David W Russ; Samuel T Leitkam; James S Thomas
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.143

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.