Literature DB >> 16107527

Neural representation of bitter taste in the nucleus of the solitary tract.

Christian H Lemon1, David V Smith.   

Abstract

Based on the molecular findings that many bitter taste receptors (T2Rs) are expressed within the same receptor cells, it has been proposed that bitter taste is encoded by the activation of discrete neural elements. Here we examined how a variety of bitter stimuli are represented by neural activity in central gustatory neurons. Taste responses (spikes/s) evoked by bathing the tongue and palate with intensity-matched concentrations (in M) of 2 sugars (0.32 sucrose and 0.5 D-fructose), ethanol (40%), 4 salts (0.01 NaCl, 0.008 NaNO(3), 0.01 MgCl(2), and 0.05 KCl), 2 acids (0.003 HCl and 0.005 citric acid), and 10 bitter ligands (0.007 quinine-HCl, 0.015 denatonium benzoate, 0.003 l-cysteine, 0.001 nicotine, 0.005 strychnine-HCl, 0.04 tetraethylammonium chloride, 0.03 atropine-SO(4), 0.005 brucine-SO(4), 0.03 papaverine-HCl, and 0.009 sparteine) were recorded from 51 neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract of anesthetized rats. Cluster analysis was used to categorize neurons into types based on responses to sucrose, NaCl, HCl, and quinine-HCl. Three groupings emerged: type S (responded optimally to sweets), type N (sodium-optimal), and type H/Q (responded robustly to bitters, acids, and salts). Multivariate analyses revealed that across-neuron patterns of response among bitter stimuli were strongly correlated. However, neural type H/Q, which was most responsive to bitter tastants, was not differentially sensitive to bitter stimuli and Na(+) salts, which rats perceive as distinct. Thus central neurons most responsive to bitter substances receive significant input from receptors that mediate other tastes, indicating that bitter stimuli are not represented by activity in specifically tuned neurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16107527     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00700.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  30 in total

Review 1.  It's all a matter of taste: gustatory processing and ingestive decisions.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

2.  Multisensory Processing of Gustatory Stimuli.

Authors:  S A Simon; I E de Araujo; J R Stapleton; M A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.833

3.  Citric acid and quinine share perceived chemosensory features making oral discrimination difficult in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Clare M Mathes; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Changes in electrogustometry thresholds, tongue tip vascularization, density and form of the fungiform papillae in smokers.

Authors:  Pavlos Pavlidis; Charalampos Gouveris; Georgios Kekes; Jan Maurer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Temperature Influences Chorda Tympani Nerve Responses to Sweet, Salty, Sour, Umami, and Bitter Stimuli in Mice.

Authors:  Bo Lu; Joseph M Breza; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Adolescent ethanol exposure and differential rearing environment affect taste reactivity to ethanol in rats.

Authors:  Thomas J Wukitsch; Theodore J Moser; Emma C Brase; Stephen W Kiefer; Mary E Cain
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 2.405

7.  T1r3 taste receptor involvement in gustatory neural responses to ethanol and oral ethanol preference.

Authors:  Susan M Brasser; Meghan B Norman; Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 8.  Central taste anatomy and physiology.

Authors:  Roberto Vincis; Alfredo Fontanini
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2019

9.  Contribution of the T1r3 taste receptor to the response properties of central gustatory neurons.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon; Robert F Margolskee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Evaluation of young smokers and non-smokers with Electrogustometry and Contact Endoscopy.

Authors:  Pavlidis Pavlos; Nikolaidis Vasilios; Anogeianaki Antonia; Koutsonikolas Dimitrios; Kekes Georgios; Anogianakis Georgios
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2009-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.