Literature DB >> 16106201

DNA stabilization is critical for maximizing performance of fecal DNA-based colorectal cancer tests.

Jeff Olson1, Duncan H Whitney, Kristine Durkee, Anthony P Shuber.   

Abstract

We have developed a multitarget, fecal DNA screening assay that detects the presence of gene-specific mutations and long DNA fragments associated with colorectal cancer (CRC). We continue to investigate methods that may be used to optimize clinical sensitivity. The goals of this investigation are to establish how sample handling conditions affect the stability of DNA in stool, thereby potentially limiting clinical sensitivity, and to determine conditions to ameliorate DNA degradation. A study was run comparing paired sample aliquots. Quantitative PCR data for matched aliquots was used to determine first the effect of sample incubation on total recovery and integrity of DNA, then the effect of stabilization buffer addition to stool on recoverable DNA, and finally the impact of buffer addition on assay sensitivity. Comparison of quantitative PCR data for paired aliquots shows that the amount of recoverable human DNA is negatively affected by storing stool samples (N = 43) at room temperature for > or =36 hours (P = 0.0018). However, the addition of stabilization buffer leads to a significant increase in recovery of DNA (P = 0.010), compared with samples incubated without buffer. Whereas the DNA Integrity Assay (DIA) is found to be sensitive to DNA degradation (sensitivity was reduced by 82%; P = 0.0002), point mutation marker sensitivity is more refractory. Overall, DNA can be stabilized by addition of buffer to the sample, leading to increased assay sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16106201     DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000176768.18423.7e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Mol Pathol        ISSN: 1052-9551


  26 in total

Review 1.  Fecal DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening: Molecular targets and perspectives.

Authors:  Amaninder Dhaliwal; Panagiotis J Vlachostergios; Katerina G Oikonomou; Yitzchak Moshenyat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-10-15

2.  Next-generation stool DNA test accurately detects colorectal cancer and large adenomas.

Authors:  David A Ahlquist; Hongzhi Zou; Michael Domanico; Douglas W Mahoney; Tracy C Yab; William R Taylor; Malinda L Butz; Stephen N Thibodeau; Linda Rabeneck; Lawrence F Paszat; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Niels Chr Bjerregaard; Søren Laurberg; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Barry M Berger; Graham P Lidgard
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  The stool DNA test is more accurate than the plasma septin 9 test in detecting colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  David A Ahlquist; William R Taylor; Douglas W Mahoney; Hongzhi Zou; Michael Domanico; Stephen N Thibodeau; Lisa A Boardman; Barry M Berger; Graham P Lidgard
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 4.  Molecular markers for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Brandon T Dickinson; John Kisiel; David A Ahlquist; William M Grady
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Stool Investigations for Colorectal Cancer Screening: From Occult Blood Test to DNA Analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Iannone; Giuseppe Losurdo; Maria Pricci; Bruna Girardi; Antonio Massaro; Mariabeatrice Principi; Michele Barone; Enzo Ierardi; Alfredo Di Leo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2016-06

6.  Analytical sensitivity and stability of DNA methylation testing in stool samples for colorectal cancer detection.

Authors:  Linda J W Bosch; Sandra Mongera; Jochim S Terhaar Sive Droste; Frank A Oort; Sietze T van Turenhout; Maarten T Penning; Joost Louwagie; Chris J J Mulder; Manon van Engeland; Beatriz Carvalho; Gerrit A Meijer
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 7.  Genetic and epigenetic marker-based DNA test of stool is a promising approach for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Sung Whan An; Nam Kyu Kim; Hyun Cheol Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer biomarkers: to be or not to be? Cautionary tales from a road well travelled.

Authors:  Kim Y C Fung; Edouard Nice; Ilka Priebe; Damien Belobrajdic; Aloke Phatak; Leanne Purins; Bruce Tabor; Celine Pompeia; Trevor Lockett; Timothy E Adams; Antony Burgess; Leah Cosgrove
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Circulating and stool nucleic acid analysis for colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Giulia De Maio; Claudia Rengucci; Wainer Zoli; Daniele Calistri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Stool DNA testing for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  J B Kisiel; T C Yab; F T Nazer Hussain; W R Taylor; M M Garrity-Park; W J Sandborn; E V Loftus; B G Wolff; T C Smyrk; S H Itzkowitz; D T Rubin; H Zou; D W Mahoney; D A Ahlquist
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 8.171

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.