Literature DB >> 16105788

Risk factors for intrauterine growth restriction in a socio-economically disadvantaged region.

Monique E Kleijer1, Gus A Dekker, Adrian R Heard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for pregnancies being complicated by the birth of a small-for-gestational age (SGA) infant were analysed in a socio-economically disadvantaged area, with separate analysis for population-based and customized-based birth weight percentiles.
METHODS: A retrospective case-controlled study of all singleton pregnancies resulting in the birth of an infant with a birth weight < 10 population-based centile, born in the Northern suburbs of metropolitan Adelaide, between 1998 and 2003. Significant risk factors in the univariate analysis were subsequently checked with multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: The analyses confirm marked differences between population-based and customized-birth weight centiles. Patterns of risk factors show clear differences in risk factors for these two different SGA groups. Univariate analyses of all (nulliparous and multiparous women) customized SGA infants shows us the following odds ratio's (OR); unemployment OR 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46-2.92, being a single mother OR 1.90, CI 1.76-2.05, smoking OR 3.24, CI 2.32 - 4.54, recreational drug use OR 2.40, CI 1.55-3.70, mental health problems OR 1.52, CI 1.04-2.23, domestic violence OR 3.42, CI 1.26-9.29, being healthy OR 0.43, CI 0.30-0.61, preeclampsia OR 1.73, CI 1.01-2.97, and BMI < 30 OR 0.63 CI 0.43-0.93. Length of pregnancy interval had no relationship whatsoever with the risk of being delivered of an SGA infant. Multivariate analyses for customized SGA showed five factors with an OR > 2 (95% CI not crossing 1), including unemployment, smoking, maternal age > 34 years, not being healthy and preeclampsia, while different paternity, age 25-34 compared to age < 25 were also found to be significant risk factors. Higher systolic blood pressure was found to convey significant protection.
CONCLUSION: When studying risk factors for pregnancies complicated by the birth of an SGA infant, both population-derived and customized growth centiles should be utilized. This study confirms the importance of smoking as a major risk factor, our data also show major protection being conveyed by having a regular job and being generally healthy. Pregnancy interval did not have any relationship with the birth of SGA infants, while paternity change was identified as a clear risk factor. Although genuine preeclampsia persists as a clear risk factor, higher systolic blood pressure appears to convey protection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16105788     DOI: 10.1080/14767050500127674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  12 in total

1.  Are socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence of small-for-gestational-age birth narrowing? Findings from a population-based cohort in the South of England.

Authors:  Sam Wilding; Nida Ziauddeen; Paul Roderick; Dianna Smith; Debbie Chase; Nick Macklon; Nuala McGrath; Mark Hanson; Nisreen A Alwan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Polymorphisms in maternal and fetal genes encoding for proteins involved in extracellular matrix metabolism alter the risk for small-for-gestational-age.

Authors:  Digna R Velez Edwards; Roberto Romero; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Sonia S Hassan; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Edi Vaisbuch; Chong Jai Kim; Offer Erez; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Brad D Pearce; Jacquelaine Bartlett; Lara A Friel; Benjamin A Salisbury; Madan Kumar Anant; Gerald F Vovis; Min Seob Lee; Ricardo Gomez; Ernesto Behnke; Enrique Oyarzun; Gerard Tromp; Ramkumar Menon; Scott M Williams
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2010-07-09

Review 3.  Developmental origins of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease as a risk factor for exaggerated metabolic and cardiovascular-renal disease.

Authors:  Frank T Spradley; Jillian A Smith; Barbara T Alexander; Christopher D Anderson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.310

4.  Small size for gestational age and the risk for infant mortality in the subsequent pregnancy.

Authors:  Hamisu M Salihu; Abraham Salinas; Euna M August; Mulubrhan F Mogos; Hanna Weldeselasse; Valerie E Whiteman
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Intrauterine growth standards: a cross-sectional study in a population of nigerian newborns.

Authors:  Olugbenga A Mokuolu; Omotayo O Adesiyun; Mohammed B Suleiman; Mustapha Bello
Journal:  Pediatr Rep       Date:  2012-09-28

6.  Soluble HLA-G levels in seminal plasma are associated with HLA-G 3'UTR genotypes and haplotypes.

Authors:  Moniek H C Craenmehr; Geert W Haasnoot; Jos J M Drabbels; Marijke J Spruyt-Gerritse; Milo Cao; Carin van der Keur; Johanna M Kapsenberg; Merve Uyar-Mercankaya; Els van Beelen; Tess Meuleman; Marie-Louise P van der Hoorn; Sebastiaan Heidt; Frans H J Claas; Michael Eikmans
Journal:  HLA       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.513

7.  Newborns of mothers with intellectual disability have a higher risk of perinatal death and being small for gestational age.

Authors:  Berit Höglund; Peter Lindgren; Margareta Larsson
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  The joint influence of marital status, interpregnancy interval, and neighborhood on small for gestational age birth: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nathalie Auger; Mark Daniel; Robert W Platt; Zhong-Cheng Luo; Yuquan Wu; Robert Choinière
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/080, October 2016).

Authors:  Sven Kehl; Jörg Dötsch; Kurt Hecher; Dietmar Schlembach; Dagmar Schmitz; Holger Stepan; Ulrich Gembruch
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.915

10.  Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes in high-resource settings: An updated systematic review.

Authors:  Katherine A Ahrens; Heidi Nelson; Reva L Stidd; Susan Moskosky; Jennifer A Hutcheon
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.