Literature DB >> 31362961

Are socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence of small-for-gestational-age birth narrowing? Findings from a population-based cohort in the South of England.

Sam Wilding1, Nida Ziauddeen1, Paul Roderick1, Dianna Smith2, Debbie Chase3, Nick Macklon4,5, Nuala McGrath1,6, Mark Hanson7,8, Nisreen A Alwan1,8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate socioeconomic inequalities, using maternal educational attainment, maternal and partner employment status, and lone motherhood indicators, in the risk of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) births, their time trend, potential mediation by maternal smoking and body mass index, and effect modification by parity.
DESIGN: Population-based birth cohort using routine antenatal healthcare data.
SETTING: Babies born at University Hospital Southampton, UK, between 2004 and 2016. PARTICIPANTS: 65 909 singleton live births born to mothers aged ≥18 years between 24-week and 42-week gestation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SGA (birth weight <10th percentile for others born at the same number of completed weeks compared with 2013/2014 within England and Wales).
RESULTS: Babies born to mothers educated up to secondary school level (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.32, 99% CI 1.19 to 1.47), who were unemployed (aOR 1.27, 99% CI 1.16 to 1.38) or with unemployed partners (aOR 1.27, 99% CI 1.13 to 1.43), were at greater risk of being SGA. There was no statistically significant change in the magnitude of this risk difference by these indicators over time between 2004 and 2016, as estimated by linear interactions with year of birth. Babies born to lone mothers were not at higher risk compared with partnered mothers after adjusting for maternal smoking (aOR 1.05, 99% CI 0.93 to 1.20). The inverse association between maternal educational attainment and SGA risk appeared greater in multiparous (aOR 1.40, 99% CI 1.10 to 1.77) compared with primiparous women (aOR 1.28, 99% CI 1.12 to 1.47), and the reverse was true for maternal and partner's unemployment where the association was stronger in primiparous women.
CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic inequalities in SGA risk by educational attainment and employment status are not narrowing over time, with differences in association strength by parity. The greater SGA risk in lone mothers was potentially explained by maternal smoking. Preventive interventions should target socially disadvantaged women, including preconception and postpartum smoking cessation to reduce SGA risk. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  public health; small for gestational age; social medicine; socioeconomic inequalities

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31362961      PMCID: PMC6678068          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  42 in total

1.  Beyond biology: the social context of prenatal behaviour and birth outcomes.

Authors:  D J Pevalin; T J Wade; A Brannigan; R Sauve
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Philip Blumenshine; Susan Egerter; Colleen J Barclay; Catherine Cubbin; Paula A Braveman
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Social class inequalities in perinatal outcomes: Scotland 1980-2000.

Authors:  L Fairley; A H Leyland
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  The impact of the Great Recession on health-related risk factors, behaviour and outcomes in England.

Authors:  Mireia Jofre-Bonet; Victoria Serra-Sastre; Sotiris Vandoros
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Trends in risk factors for lifestyle-related diseases by socioeconomic position in Geneva, Switzerland, 1993-2000: health inequalities persist.

Authors:  Bruna Galobardes; Michael C Costanza; Martine S Bernstein; Cecile Delhumeau; Alfredo Morabia
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Maternal blood pressures during pregnancy and the risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age neonate.

Authors:  Dana M Block-Abraham; Dasha Adamovich; Ozhan M Turan; Lauren E Doyle; Miriam G Blitzer; Ahmet A Baschat
Journal:  Hypertens Pregnancy       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.108

7.  Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: The perils of multiple testing.

Authors:  Priya Ranganathan; C S Pramesh; Marc Buyse
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

8.  Contribution of socioeconomic status to the risk of small for gestational age infants--a population-based study of 1,390,165 singleton live births in Finland.

Authors:  Sari Räisänen; Mika Gissler; Ulla Sankilampi; Juho Saari; Michael R Kramer; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2013-05-01

9.  No improvement in socioeconomic inequalities in birthweight and preterm birth over four decades: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Svetlana V Glinianaia; Rakesh Ghosh; Judith Rankin; Mark S Pearce; Louise Parker; Tanja Pless-Mulloli
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Mother's education and the risk of preterm and small for gestational age birth: a DRIVERS meta-analysis of 12 European cohorts.

Authors:  Milagros Ruiz; Peter Goldblatt; Joana Morrison; Lubomír Kukla; Jan Švancara; Marjo Riitta-Järvelin; Anja Taanila; Marie-Josèphe Saurel-Cubizolles; Sandrine Lioret; Chryssa Bakoula; Alexandra Veltsista; Daniela Porta; Francesco Forastiere; Manon van Eijsden; Tanja G M Vrijkotte; Merete Eggesbø; Richard A White; Henrique Barros; Sofia Correia; Martine Vrijheid; Maties Torrent; Marisa Rebagliato; Isabel Larrañaga; Johnny Ludvigsson; Åshild Olsen Faresjö; Daniel Hryhorczuk; Youriy Antipkin; Michael Marmot; Hynek Pikhart
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  4 in total

1.  Maternal smoking behaviour across the first two pregnancies and small for gestational age birth: Analysis of the SLOPE (Studying Lifecourse Obesity PrEdictors) population-based cohort in the South of England.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Taylor; Pia Doh; Nida Ziauddeen; Keith M Godfrey; Ann Berrington; Nisreen A Alwan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Low birth weight trends in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries, 2000-2015: economic, health system and demographic conditionings.

Authors:  Diego Erasun; Jéssica Alonso-Molero; Inés Gómez-Acebo; Trinidad Dierssen-Sotos; Javier Llorca; José Schneider
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Demographic, socio-economic, obstetric, and behavioral factors associated with small-and large-for-gestational-age from a prospective, population-based pregnancy cohort in rural Nepal: a secondary data analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hazel; Diwakar Mohan; Scott Zeger; Luke C Mullany; James M Tielsch; Subarna K Khatry; Seema Subedi; Steven C LeClerq; Robert E Black; Joanne Katz
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.105

4.  Socioeconomic inequalities and adverse pregnancy outcomes in the UK and Republic of Ireland: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katie Thomson; Malcolm Moffat; Oluwatomi Arisa; Amrita Jesurasa; Catherine Richmond; Adefisayo Odeniyi; Clare Bambra; Judith Rankin; Heather Brown; Julie Bishop; Susan Wing; Amy McNaughton; Nicola Heslehurst
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.