Literature DB >> 16105191

Association between the intact foreskin and inferior standards of male genital hygiene behaviour: a cross-sectional study.

Nigel O'Farrell1, Maria Quigley, Paul Fox.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine whether non-circumcised men have inferior standards of genital hygiene behaviour, as measured by reported washing of the whole penis, compared with circumcised men. Male attenders at a sexually transmitted infections (STI) clinic at Ealing Hospital, London had routine STI tests and examinations performed and were asked about the frequency and thoroughness of genital washing. One hundred and fifty non-circumcised and 75 circumcised men were enrolled. Not always washing the whole penis, including retracting the foreskin in non-circumcised men every time they washed (defined as inferior genital hygiene behaviour) was more common in non-circumcised (26%) than circumcised men (4%) (crude odds ratio = 8.43, 95% confidence interval: 2.51-28.3, P<0.001) and those with balanitis (42% and 5%, P=0.036). Circumcised men were more likely than non-circumcised men to wash the genital area more than once a day (37% and 19%, P=0.011). Studies investigating the relationship between male circumcision status and other outcomes, for example HIV infection, should include assessment of genital hygiene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16105191     DOI: 10.1258/0956462054679151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J STD AIDS        ISSN: 0956-4624            Impact factor:   1.359


  9 in total

1.  Reduced clearance of penile human papillomavirus infection in uncircumcised men.

Authors:  Brenda Y Hernandez; Yurii B Shvetsov; Marc T Goodman; Lynne R Wilkens; Pamela Thompson; Xuemei Zhu; Lily Ning
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  The effect of medical male circumcision on urogenital Mycoplasma genitalium among men in Kisumu, Kenya.

Authors:  Supriya D Mehta; Charlotte Gaydos; Ian Maclean; Elijah Odoyo-June; Stephen Moses; Lawrence Agunda; Nicole Quinn; Robert C Bailey
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 3.  Challenges and controversies in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Majid Shabbir; Oliver Kayes; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Critical evaluation of unscientific arguments disparaging affirmative infant male circumcision policy.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; John N Krieger; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2016-08-08

5.  Primary prevention and vaccination for penile cancer.

Authors:  Majid Shabbir; Ravi Barod; Paul K Hegarty; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2013-06

Review 6.  A 'snip' in time: what is the best age to circumcise?

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Jake H Waskett; Joya Banerjee; Richard G Wamai; Aaron A R Tobian; Ronald H Gray; Stefan A Bailis; Robert C Bailey; Jeffrey D Klausner; Robin J Willcourt; Daniel T Halperin; Thomas E Wiswell; Adrian Mindel
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.125

7.  Current and future strategies in the diagnosis and management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Samuel M Lawindy; Alejandro R Rodriguez; Simon Horenblas; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-05-30

8.  Early infant male circumcision: Systematic review, risk-benefit analysis, and progress in policy.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Sean E Kennedy; Alex D Wodak; Adrian Mindel; David Golovsky; Leslie Schrieber; Eugenie R Lumbers; David J Handelsman; John B Ziegler
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2017-02-08

Review 9.  Penile Inflammatory Skin Disorders and the Preventive Role of Circumcision.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; John N Krieger
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2017-05-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.