Literature DB >> 16102818

Anterior spinal column augmentation with injectable bone cements.

Jorrit-Jan Verlaan1, F Cumhur Oner, Wouter J A Dhert.   

Abstract

A vertebral fracture, whether originating from osteoporosis or trauma, can be the cause of pain, disability, deformation and neurological deficit. The treatment of vertebral compression fractures has, for many years until the advent of vertebroplasty, consisted of bedrest and analgesics. Vertebroplasty is a percutaneous technique during which bone cement is injected in a vertebral body to provide immediate pain relief by stabilization. Inflatable bone tamps can, prior to the injection of cement, be used to create a void in the vertebral body, in which case the technique is known as balloon vertebroplasty (or kyphoplasty). The chance of extracorporal cement leakage is smaller for balloon vertebroplasty than for vertebroplasty. Some authors also claim to have gained some correction in vertebral body height or angulation. Both interventions can be used for several indications, including osteoporotic compression fractures and osteolytic lesions of the vertebral body such as myeloma, hemangioma or metastasis, and also for traumatic burst fractures in combination with pedicle screw instrumentation. Polymethyl methacrylate cement is the bone void filler that is used most frequently, although the application of calcium phosphate cements has been studied widely in vitro, in vivo and also in small-scale clinical series. The clinical results of (balloon-) vertebroplasty are favorable with 85-95% of all patients experiencing immediate and long-lasting relief of pain. Serious complications are relatively rare but include neurological deficit and pulmonary embolism. In this paper, both vertebroplasty and balloon vertebroplasty and their respective indications, techniques and results are described in relation with the application and limitations of permanent and resorbable injectable bone cements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16102818     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  14 in total

1.  An improved collagen scaffold for skeletal regeneration.

Authors:  Serafim M Oliveira; Rushali A Ringshia; Racquel Z Legeros; Elizabeth Clark; Michael J Yost; Louis Terracio; Cristina C Teixeira
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.396

2.  Letter to the Editor concerning "Osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures: long-term retrospective comparison between vertebroplasty and conservative treatment" by K. Martikos et al. [Eur Spine J (2018) doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5605-1].

Authors:  Mario Ganau; So Kato; Yasushi Oshima
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic fractures: secured knowledge and open questions].

Authors:  K Bohndorf; R Fessl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Microvascular response to calcium phosphate bone substitutes: an intravital microscopy analysis.

Authors:  Bernd Roetman; Andrej Ring; Stefan Langer; Thomas A Schildhauer; Gert Muhr; Manfred Köller
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Investigating the Effects of Surface-Initiated Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone to Bioactive Glass Particles on the Mechanical Properties of Settable Polymer/Ceramic Composites.

Authors:  Andrew J Harmata; Catherine L Ward; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Joseph C Wenke; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  J Mater Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.089

6.  Characterization of polymeric solutions as injectable vehicles for hydroxyapatite microspheres.

Authors:  Serafim M Oliveira; Isabel F Almeida; Paulo C Costa; Cristina C Barrias; M Rosa Pena Ferreira; M Fernanda Bahia; Mário A Barbosa
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 7.  Back stab: percutaneous vertebroplasty for severe back pain.

Authors:  Susitna Banerjee; Mark Otto Baerlocher; Murray R Asch
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Optimisation of the mechanical and handling properties of an injectable calcium phosphate cement.

Authors:  R M O'Hara; N J Dunne; J F Orr; F J Buchanan; R K Wilcox; D C Barton
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Osteoblast response to polymethyl methacrylate bioactive glass composite.

Authors:  M Hautamäki; V V Meretoja; R H Mattila; A J Aho; P K Vallittu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Development of calcium phosphate cement for the augmentation of traumatically fractured porcine specimens using vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Sami M Tarsuslugil; Rochelle M O'Hara; Nicholas J Dunne; Fraser J Buchanan; John F Orr; David C Barton; Ruth K Wilcox
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.