Literature DB >> 16101304

Integrated insights from simulation, experiment, and mutational analysis yield new details of LacI function.

Liskin Swint-Kruse1, Hongli Zhan, Kathleen Shive Matthews.   

Abstract

Protein structural change underlies many signal transduction processes. Although end-state structures are known for various allosteric proteins, intermediates are difficult to observe. Recently, targeted molecular dynamics simulation (TMD) was used to examine the conformational transition and predict relevant intermediates for wild-type lactose repressor (LacI). A catalog of involved residues suggests that the transition of this homodimer is asymmetric and that K84 is a prominent participant in the dynamic N-subdomain interface. Previous experiments indicated that hydrophobic substitutions at position 84 engender slowed, biphasic inducer binding kinetics, which might reflect the same phenomena observed in TMD. Here, we report biochemical confirmation that DNA and inducer binding remain allosterically linked in K84A and K84L, albeit with a differential smaller than that found in wild-type LacI. Other features of these mutant proteins are consistent with an allosteric conformational shift that approximates that of the wild type. As a consequence, these repressors can be utilized to explore an unanswered question about LacI function: How many inducers (one or two per dimer) are required to diminish operator affinity? The biphasic natures of the K84L and K84A inducer association rates allow direct correlation between the two distinct inducer binding events and operator release. Indeed, the kinetics of operator release for the K84A and K84L closely parallel those for the second inducer binding event. Together with implications from previous equilibrium results for wild-type and mutant proteins, these kinetic data demonstrate that binding of two inducers per dimeric DNA binding unit is required to release the operator in these variant LacI proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16101304     DOI: 10.1021/bi050404+

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  14 in total

Review 1.  Flexibility and Disorder in Gene Regulation: LacI/GalR and Hox Proteins.

Authors:  Sarah E Bondos; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Kathleen S Matthews
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Extrinsic interactions dominate helical propensity in coupled binding and folding of the lactose repressor protein hinge helix.

Authors:  Hongli Zhan; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Kathleen Shive Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  The strengths and limitations of using biolayer interferometry to monitor equilibrium titrations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Chamitha J Weeramange; Max S Fairlamb; Dipika Singh; Aron W Fenton; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Crystal structure of PhnF, a GntR-family transcriptional regulator of phosphate transport in Mycobacterium smegmatis.

Authors:  Susanne Gebhard; Jason N Busby; Georg Fritz; Nicole J Moreland; Gregory M Cook; J Shaun Lott; Edward N Baker; Victoria A Money
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Positions 94-98 of the lactose repressor N-subdomain monomer-monomer interface are critical for allosteric communication.

Authors:  Hongli Zhan; Maricela Camargo; Kathleen S Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Ligand-induced conformational changes and conformational dynamics in the solution structure of the lactose repressor protein.

Authors:  Marc Taraban; Hongli Zhan; Andrew E Whitten; David B Langley; Kathleen S Matthews; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Jill Trewhella
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  One is not enough.

Authors:  Robert Daber; Kim Sharp; Mitchell Lewis
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  Allostery in the LacI/GalR family: variations on a theme.

Authors:  Liskin Swint-Kruse; Kathleen S Matthews
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 7.934

9.  DNA-recognition process described by MD simulations of the lactose repressor protein on a specific and a non-specific DNA sequence.

Authors:  Simone Furini; Paolo Barbini; Carmen Domene
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Novel insights from hybrid LacI/GalR proteins: family-wide functional attributes and biologically significant variation in transcription repression.

Authors:  Sarah Meinhardt; Michael W Manley; Nicole A Becker; Jacob A Hessman; L James Maher; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.