Saqib I Dara1, Bekele Afessa. 1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: With an increasing number of critical care beds, a shortage of critical care physicians, and pressure from purchasers, there is a need to define the optimal intensivist-to-ICU bed ratio. The objective of this study was to determine if there are any associations between the intensivist-to-ICU bed ratio and the outcome of patients admitted to the medical ICU. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS: All critically ill patients admitted to a medical ICU between December 8, 2001, and July 14, 2003. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Demographics, APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) III-predicted mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and ICU and hospital mortality rates. Four time periods based on intensivist-to-ICU bed ratios of 1:7.5, 1:9.5, 1:12, and 1:15 were identified. Regression analyses were performed to develop customized models to predict ICU and hospital LOS and mortality. The ICU LOS ratio, defined as the ratio of the observed to predicted LOS, and standardized mortality ratio (SMR) were calculated for each of the four periods. RESULTS: A total of 2,492 patients were included in the study. There was no difference in the severity of illness at the time of ICU admission among the four periods. The mean ICU LOS ratio was longer for an intensivist-to-ICU bed ratio of 1:15 compared to the other periods. The ICU and hospital SMR did not differ significantly among the four periods. CONCLUSION: Differences in intensivist-to-ICU bed ratios, ranging from 1:7.5 to 1:15, were not associated with differences in ICU or hospital mortality. However, a ratio of 1:15 was associated with increased ICU LOS.
OBJECTIVE: With an increasing number of critical care beds, a shortage of critical care physicians, and pressure from purchasers, there is a need to define the optimal intensivist-to-ICU bed ratio. The objective of this study was to determine if there are any associations between the intensivist-to-ICU bed ratio and the outcome of patients admitted to the medical ICU. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS: All critically illpatients admitted to a medical ICU between December 8, 2001, and July 14, 2003. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Demographics, APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) III-predicted mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and ICU and hospital mortality rates. Four time periods based on intensivist-to-ICU bed ratios of 1:7.5, 1:9.5, 1:12, and 1:15 were identified. Regression analyses were performed to develop customized models to predict ICU and hospital LOS and mortality. The ICU LOS ratio, defined as the ratio of the observed to predicted LOS, and standardized mortality ratio (SMR) were calculated for each of the four periods. RESULTS: A total of 2,492 patients were included in the study. There was no difference in the severity of illness at the time of ICU admission among the four periods. The mean ICU LOS ratio was longer for an intensivist-to-ICU bed ratio of 1:15 compared to the other periods. The ICU and hospital SMR did not differ significantly among the four periods. CONCLUSION: Differences in intensivist-to-ICU bed ratios, ranging from 1:7.5 to 1:15, were not associated with differences in ICU or hospital mortality. However, a ratio of 1:15 was associated with increased ICU LOS.
Authors: M Bodí; M Olona; M C Martín; R Alceaga; J C Rodríguez; E Corral; J M Pérez Villares; G Sirgo Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Laura Temime; Lulla Opatowski; Yohan Pannet; Christian Brun-Buisson; Pierre Yves Boëlle; Didier Guillemot Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-10-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mitchell M Levy; John Rapoport; Stanley Lemeshow; Donald B Chalfin; Gary Phillips; Marion Danis Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-06-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Bekele Afessa; Ognjen Gajic; Ian J Morales; Mark T Keegan; Steve G Peters; Rolf D Hubmayr Journal: Chest Date: 2009-06-08 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Clemens Grimm; Steffen Dickel; Alexandra Sachkova; Maria Popp; Martin Golinksi; Falk Fichtner; Peter Kranke; Christian Seeber; Sven Laudi; Sebastian Voigt-Radloff; Onnen Moerer Journal: Cureus Date: 2021-06-19