PURPOSE: To retrospectively identify and describe the imaging features that represent perivascular fatty infiltration of the liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved the study and waived informed consent. The study complied with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Ten patients (seven women, three men; mean age, 78 years; range, 31-78 years) with fatty infiltration surrounding hepatic veins and/or portal tracts were retrospectively identified by searching the abdominal imaging teaching file of an academic hospital. The patients' medical records were reviewed by one author. Computed tomographic (CT), magnetic resonance (MR), and ultrasonographic (US) imaging studies were reviewed by three radiologists in consensus. Fatty infiltration of the liver on CT images was defined as absolute attenuation less than 40 HU without mass effect and, if unenhanced images were available, as relative attenuation at least 10 HU less than that of the spleen; on gradient-echo MR images, it was defined as signal loss on opposed-phase images compared with in-phase images; and on US images, it was defined as hyperechogenicity of liver relative to kidney, ultrasound beam attenuation, and poor visualization of intrahepatic structures. Perivascular fatty infiltration of the liver was defined as a clear predisposition to fat accumulation around hepatic veins and/or portal tracts. For multiphase CT images, the contrast-to-noise ratio was calculated for comparison of spared liver with fatty liver in each imaging phase. RESULTS: Fatty infiltration surrounded hepatic veins in three, portal tracts in five, and both hepatic veins and portal tracts in two patients. Six of the 10 patients had alcoholic cirrhosis, two reported regular alcohol consumption (one of whom had acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and hepatitis B), one was positive for human immunodeficiency virus, and one had no risk factors for fatty infiltration of the liver. In three of the 10 patients, fatty infiltration was misdiagnosed as vascular or neoplastic disease on initial CT images but was correctly diagnosed on MR images. CONCLUSION: Perivascular fatty infiltration of the liver has imaging features that allow its recognition. RSNA, 2005
PURPOSE: To retrospectively identify and describe the imaging features that represent perivascular fatty infiltration of the liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved the study and waived informed consent. The study complied with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Ten patients (seven women, three men; mean age, 78 years; range, 31-78 years) with fatty infiltration surrounding hepatic veins and/or portal tracts were retrospectively identified by searching the abdominal imaging teaching file of an academic hospital. The patients' medical records were reviewed by one author. Computed tomographic (CT), magnetic resonance (MR), and ultrasonographic (US) imaging studies were reviewed by three radiologists in consensus. Fatty infiltration of the liver on CT images was defined as absolute attenuation less than 40 HU without mass effect and, if unenhanced images were available, as relative attenuation at least 10 HU less than that of the spleen; on gradient-echo MR images, it was defined as signal loss on opposed-phase images compared with in-phase images; and on US images, it was defined as hyperechogenicity of liver relative to kidney, ultrasound beam attenuation, and poor visualization of intrahepatic structures. Perivascular fatty infiltration of the liver was defined as a clear predisposition to fat accumulation around hepatic veins and/or portal tracts. For multiphase CT images, the contrast-to-noise ratio was calculated for comparison of spared liver with fatty liver in each imaging phase. RESULTS: Fatty infiltration surrounded hepatic veins in three, portal tracts in five, and both hepatic veins and portal tracts in two patients. Six of the 10 patients had alcoholic cirrhosis, two reported regular alcohol consumption (one of whom had acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and hepatitis B), one was positive for human immunodeficiency virus, and one had no risk factors for fatty infiltration of the liver. In three of the 10 patients, fatty infiltration was misdiagnosed as vascular or neoplastic disease on initial CT images but was correctly diagnosed on MR images. CONCLUSION: Perivascular fatty infiltration of the liver has imaging features that allow its recognition. RSNA, 2005
Authors: Cheng William Hong; Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; Jonathan C Hooker; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Top Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-12
Authors: Artit Jirapatnakul; Anthony P Reeves; Sara Lewis; Xiangmeng Chen; Teng Ma; Rowena Yip; Xing Chin; Shuang Liu; Ponni V Perumalswami; David F Yankelevitz; Michael Crane; Andrea D Branch; Claudia I Henschke Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2019-10-25 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Allison L Kuipers; Joseph M Zmuda; J Jeffrey Carr; James G Terry; Sangeeta Nair; Ryan Cvejkus; Clareann H Bunker; Alan L Patrick; Christina L Wassel; Iva Miljkovic Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Joshua S Winder; Brandon S Dudeck; Sarayna Schock; Jerome R Lyn-Sue; Randy S Haluck; Ann M Rogers Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 4.129