Literature DB >> 19237684

Characteristics and outcomes of revascularized patients with hypertension: an international verapamil SR-trandolapril substudy.

Scott J Denardo1, Franz H Messerli, Efrain Gaxiola, Juan M Aranda, Rhonda M Cooper-Dehoff, Eileen M Handberg, Yan Gong, Annette Champion, Qian Zhou, Carl J Pepine.   

Abstract

Our understanding of the growing population of revascularized patients with hypertension is limited. We retrospectively analyzed the International Verapamil SR-Trandolapril Study, which randomized coronary artery disease patients with hypertension to either verapamil SR- or atenolol-based treatment strategies, focusing on characteristics and outcomes of 6166 previously revascularized patients compared with 16 410 nonrevascularized patients. Revascularized patients had a history of coronary artery bypass grafting (45.2%), percutaneous coronary intervention (42.1%), or both (12.8%). Compared with nonrevascularized patients, revascularized patients at baseline demonstrated a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease risk factors and risk conditions (P<0.001). This higher prevalence was the principal cause of a higher incidence of primary outcome (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) among revascularized patients (14.2% versus 8.5% for nonrevascularized patients; P<0.001). However, both patient groups demonstrated a relatively low incidence of subsequent revascularization (5.1% versus 1.5% respectively; P<0.0001). Associations between adjusted hazard ratio for primary outcome and follow-up blood pressure appeared "J shaped" for both patient groups. Because, as a group, revascularized patients with hypertension had worse outcomes compared with nonrevascularized patients, management of blood pressure to a specific target in future studies could result in improved outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19237684      PMCID: PMC2794408          DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.111542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  20 in total

1.  Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-05-16       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Treatment of hypertension in the prevention and management of ischemic heart disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council for High Blood Pressure Research and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Epidemiology and Prevention.

Authors:  Clive Rosendorff; Henry R Black; Christopher P Cannon; Bernard J Gersh; Joel Gore; Joseph L Izzo; Norman M Kaplan; Christopher M O'Connor; Patrick T O'Gara; Suzanne Oparil
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Propensity scores in cardiovascular research.

Authors:  Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Dogma disputed: can aggressively lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease be dangerous?

Authors:  Franz H Messerli; Giuseppe Mancia; C Richard Conti; Ann C Hewkin; Stuart Kupfer; Annette Champion; Rainer Kolloch; Athanase Benetos; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Relationship between cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerotic disease burden measured by intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Stephen J Nicholls; E Murat Tuzcu; Tim Crowe; Ilke Sipahi; Paul Schoenhagen; Samir Kapadia; Stanley L Hazen; Chuan-Chuan Wun; Michele Norton; Fady Ntanios; Steven E Nissen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  An updated meta-analysis of calcium-channel blockers in the prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  J Dens; W Desmet; J Piessens
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  J S Hochman; L A Sleeper; H D White; V Dzavik; S C Wong; V Menon; J G Webb; R Steingart; M H Picard; M A Menegus; J Boland; T Sanborn; C E Buller; S Modur; R Forman; P Desvigne-Nickens; A K Jacobs; J N Slater; T H LeJemtel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-01-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Eric Boersma; Nestor Mercado; Don Poldermans; Martin Gardien; Jeroen Vos; Maarten L Simoons
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-03-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Ishac Cohen; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Beta-blockers reduce the incidence of clinical restenosis: prospective study of 4840 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Jackson; Joseph B Muhlestein; T Jared Bunch; Tami L Bair; Benjamin D Horne; Troy E Madsen; Jason M Lappé; Jeffrey L Anderson
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Tight blood pressure control in diabetes: evidence-based review of treatment targets in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Reboldi; Giorgio Gentile; Valeria Maria Manfreda; Fabio Angeli; Paolo Verdecchia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Tight blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes among hypertensive patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Yan Gong; Eileen M Handberg; Anthony A Bavry; Scott J Denardo; George L Bakris; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Coronary revascularization strategy and outcomes according to blood pressure (from the International Verapamil SR-Trandolapril Study [INVEST]).

Authors:  Scott J Denardo; Franz H Messerli; Efrain Gaxiola; Juan M Aranda; Rhonda M Cooper-Dehoff; Eileen M Handberg; Yan Gong; Annette Champion; Qian Zhou; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.