Literature DB >> 16098121

Barriers to effective communication across the primary/secondary interface: examples from the ovarian cancer patient journey (a qualitative study).

M C Farquhar1, S I G Barclay, H Earl, G E Grande, J Emery, R A F Crawford.   

Abstract

Effective communication across the primary/secondary interface is vital for the planning and delivery of appropriate patient care throughout the cancer patient journey. This study describes GPs' views of the communication issues across the primary/secondary interface in relation to ovarian cancer patients using qualitative interviews with purposively sampled general practitioners (GPs) and an audit of hospital medical records of 30 deceased ovarian cancer patients. Issues raised by the GPs related to the content and format of communications, but of most concern was the tardiness. The time lag between dictation and typing letters ranged from 0 to 27 days, with a delay of up to 8 days for signing before transit through various mail systems to the GP. Three stages in the patient journey were characterized by particular issues: (1) in the pre-diagnostic and diagnostic stage was a need for prompt information regarding the results of tests and diagnoses, and clearer guidance on the use of tests and fast-track referrals; (2) in the active treatment phase, when GPs could lose touch with their patients, they needed effective communication in order to provide moral support and crisis management; and (3) when oncology withdrew and the focus of care switched back to the community for the terminal phase, GPs needed information to enable them to pick up the baton of care. There is a need to develop and evaluate interventions aimed at improving the content and speed of communications between secondary and primary care. Such interventions are likely to be complex and might include the greater use of telephone or fax for more selected communications, a review of secretarial support, the use of email, the development of GP designed proformas, the feasibility of patient/carer letter delivery options, nurse-led communication, universal electronic patient records, or a revisiting of the patient-held record.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16098121     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00596.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  24 in total

1.  Views of psycho-oncology health professionals on priority psycho-oncology research questions.

Authors:  Nicole M Rankin; Phyllis N Butow; Melanie A Price; Alison Evans
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Improving how secondary care and general practice in England work together: requirements in the NHS Standard Contract.

Authors:  Amy Price; Azeem Majeed
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  A doctor close at hand: How GPs view their role in cancer care.

Authors:  May-Lill Johansen; Knut Arne Holtedahl; Carl Edvard Rudebeck
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 2.581

4.  How do general practitioners and specialists value their mutual communication? A survey.

Authors:  Annette J Berendsen; Annegriet Kuiken; Wim H G M Benneker; Betty Meyboom-de Jong; Theo B Voorn; Jan Schuling
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  Patients' views on the effectiveness of patient-held records: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Samantha A Sartain; Samantha Stressing; Jacqui Prieto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 6.  Enhancing continuity of information: essential components of consultation reports.

Authors:  Whitney Berta; Jan Barnsley; Jeff Bloom; Rhonda Cockerill; Dave Davis; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Anne Marie Mior; Yves Talbot; Eugene Vayda
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Care of elderly people by the general practitioner and the geriatrician in Belgium: a qualitative study of their relationship.

Authors:  Isabelle Dagneaux; Isabelle Gilard; Jan De Lepeleire
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2012-01-25

8.  Preparing general practitioners to receive cancer patients following treatment in secondary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ann Dorrit Guassora; Lene Jarlbaek; Thorkil Thorsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Informal work and formal plans: articulating the active role of patients in cancer trajectories.

Authors:  Rikke Juul Dalsted; Bibi Hølge-Hazelton; Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard; John Sahl Andersen
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 5.120

10.  "We talk it over"--mixed-method study of interdisciplinary collaborations in private practice among urologists and oncologists in Germany.

Authors:  Sandra Beermann; Denny Chakkalakal; Rebecca Muckelbauer; Lothar Weißbach; Christine Holmberg
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.