Literature DB >> 16097863

Is prior knowledge of object geometry used in visually guided reaching?

Bruce Hartung1, Paul R Schrater, Heinrich H Bülthoff, Daniel Kersten, Volker H Franz.   

Abstract

We investigated whether humans use prior knowledge of the geometry of faces in visually guided reaching. When viewing the inside of a mask of a face, the mask is often perceived as being a normal (convex) face, instead of the veridical, hollow (concave) shape. In this "hollow-face illusion," prior knowledge of the shape of faces dominates perception, even when in conflict with information from binocular disparity. Computer images of normal and hollow faces were presented, such that depth information from binocular disparity was consistent or in conflict with prior knowledge of the geometry. Participants reached to touch either the nose or cheek of the faces or gave verbal estimates of the corresponding distances. We found that reaching to touch was dominated by prior knowledge of face geometry. However, hollow faces were estimated to be flatter than normal faces. This suggests that the visual system combines binocular disparity and prior assumptions, rather than completely discounting one or the other. When comparing the magnitude of the hollow-face illusion in reaching and verbal tasks, we found that the flattening effect of the illusion was similar for verbal and reaching tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16097863     DOI: 10.1167/5.6.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  8 in total

1.  Methods to explore the influence of top-down visual processes on motor behavior.

Authors:  Jillian Nguyen; Thomas V Papathomas; Jay H Ravaliya; Elizabeth B Torres
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Heuristic Vetoing: Top-Down Influences of the Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic Can Override the Bottom-Up Information in Visual Images.

Authors:  Fallon Branch; Erin Park; Jay Hegdé
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  Self versus environment motion in postural control.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Temporal integration limits of stereovision in reaching and grasping.

Authors:  K R Wilson; P M Pearson; H E Matheson; J J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The hollow-face illusion in infancy: do infants see a screen based rotating hollow mask as hollow?

Authors:  Aki Tsuruhara; Emi Nakato; Yumiko Otsuka; So Kanazawa; Masami K Yamaguchi; Harold Hill
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-07-18

6.  Where do the eyes really go in the hollow-face illusion?

Authors:  Marc Grosjean; Gerhard Rinkenauer; Stephanie Jainta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Automatically Characterizing Sensory-Motor Patterns Underlying Reach-to-Grasp Movements on a Physical Depth Inversion Illusion.

Authors:  Jillian Nguyen; Ushma V Majmudar; Jay H Ravaliya; Thomas V Papathomas; Elizabeth B Torres
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Biasing Influence of 'Mental Shortcuts' on Diagnostic Decision-Making: Radiologists Can Overlook Breast Cancer in Mammograms When Prior Diagnostic Information Is Available.

Authors:  Fallon Branch; Isabella Santana; Jay Hegdé
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.