Literature DB >> 16097541

A reliable DEXA measurement technique for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

James R D Murray1, Nick J Cooke, David Rawlings, James P Holland, Andrew W McCaskie.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) has been used to measure bone mineral density (BMD) around total hip prostheses. With the recent increase in the use of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing, such as the Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR), we aimed to produce a reliable method of measuring bone density around a metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
METHODS: We performed DEXA scans on 5 patients (7 BHRs), who had undergone resurfacing with the BHR within the past 2 years. A zonal reporting technique was devised and evaluated.
RESULTS: The intraclass correlation (i.e. the correlation between any two assessments of one region of interest) was 0.997, with an overall coefficient of variation of 5%.
INTERPRETATION: We have designed and demonstrated a safe, noninvasive and highly reproducible method for interpreting and reporting the results of DEXA scanning of BHR implants in vivo. We will now use this method to prospectively study our BHR population to assess the changes in bone density following BHR within the femoral neck. This method may add to the current techniques available for detection of impending failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16097541     DOI: 10.1080/00016470510030544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  6 in total

1.  Bone mineral density in the femoral neck increases after hip resurfacing: a cohort with five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Charles A Willis-Owen; Henry D Atkinson; Roger D Oakeshott
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  2011 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: when to release patients to high-impact activities after hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Katherine M Bedigrew; Erin L Ruh; Qin Zhang; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Bone mineral density of the femoral neck in resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeannette Østergaard Penny; Ole Ovesen; Kim Brixen; Jens-Erik Varmarken; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Bone density of the femoral neck following Birmingham hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Nick J Cooke; Lauren Rodgers; David Rawlings; Andrew W McCaskie; James P Holland
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 5.  Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Craig J Della Valle; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  An evaluation of proximal femur bone density in young, active patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty at one year postoperatively.

Authors:  Denis Nam; Rondek Salih; Robert L Barrack; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.135

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.