Literature DB >> 16097355

Nonequivalence of on-line and paper-and-pencil psychological tests: the case of the prospective memory questionnaire.

Tom Buchanan1, Tarick Ali, Thomas M Heffernan, Jonathan Ling, Andrew C Parrott, Jacqui Rodgers, Andrew B Scholey.   

Abstract

There is growing evidence that Internet-mediated psychological tests can have satisfactory psychometric properties and can measure the same constructs as traditional versions. However, equivalence cannot be taken for granted. The prospective memory questionnaire (PMQ; Hannon, Adams, Harrington, Fries-Dias, & Gibson, 1995) was used in an on-line study exploring links between drug use and memory (Rodgers et al., 2003). The PMQ has four factor-analytically derived subscales. In a large (N = 763) sample tested via the Internet, only two factors could be recovered; the other two subscales were essentially meaningless. This demonstration of nonequivalence underlines the importance of on-line test validation. Without examination of its psychometric properties, one cannot be sure that a test administered via the Internet actually measures the intended construct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16097355     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  16 in total

1.  Maternal smoking cessation and reduced academic and behavioral problems in offspring.

Authors:  Brian J Piper; Hilary M Gray; Melissa A Birkett
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Using the internet for research: results at a keystroke.

Authors:  Elizabeth Murray
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments.

Authors:  Laura Germine; Ken Nakayama; Bradley C Duchaine; Christopher F Chabris; Garga Chatterjee; Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

Review 4.  A qualitative review of the psychometric properties and feasibility of electronic headache diaries for children and adults: where we are and where we need to go.

Authors:  Jennifer N Stinson; Anna Huguet; Patrick McGrath; Brittany Rosenbloom; Charlene Soobiah; Meghan White; Geraldine Coburn
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  Concurrent validity of an online version of the Timeline Followback assessment.

Authors:  Eric R Pedersen; Joel Grow; Sean Duncan; Clayton Neighbors; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2012-04-09

6.  A within-subjects trial to test the equivalence of online and paper outcome measures: the Roland Morris disability questionnaire.

Authors:  Felicity L Bishop; Graham Lewis; Scott Harris; Naomi McKay; Philippa Prentice; Haymo Thiel; George T Lewith
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Feasibility of using web-based questionnaires in large population-based epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Alexandra Ekman; Paul W Dickman; Asa Klint; Elisabete Weiderpass; Jan-Eric Litton
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Developing a standardized approach to the assessment of pain in children and youth presenting to pediatric rheumatology providers: a Delphi survey and consensus conference process followed by feasibility testing.

Authors:  Jennifer N Stinson; Mark Connelly; Lindsay A Jibb; Laura E Schanberg; Gary Walco; Lynn R Spiegel; Shirley Ml Tse; Elizabeth C Chalom; Peter Chira; Michael Rapoff
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.054

9.  Methodological challenges in online trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth Murray; Zarnie Khadjesari; Ian R White; Eleftheria Kalaitzaki; Christine Godfrey; Jim McCambridge; Simon G Thompson; Paul Wallace
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Assessing public speaking fear with the short form of the Personal Report of Confidence as a Speaker scale: confirmatory factor analyses among a French-speaking community sample.

Authors:  Alexandre Heeren; Grazia Ceschi; David P Valentiner; Vincent Dethier; Pierre Philippot
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.