Literature DB >> 16096396

Adapting national and international leg ulcer practice guidelines for local use: the Ontario Leg Ulcer Community Care Protocol.

Ian D Graham1, Margaret B Harrison, Karen Lorimer, Tadeusz Piercianowski, Elaine Friedberg, Maureen Buchanan, Connie Harris.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because of growing resources devoted to individuals requiring community care for leg ulcers, the authority responsible for home care in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, established and evaluated a demonstration leg ulcer service. In an effort to provide current and evidence-based care, existing leg ulcer clinical practice guidelines were identified and appraised for quality and suitability to the new service. PROCESS: The Practice Guideline Evaluation and Adaptation Cycle guided development of a local protocol for leg ulcer care, which included: (1) systematically searching for practice guidelines, (2) appraising the quality of identified guidelines using a validated guideline appraisal instrument, (3) conducting a content analysis of guideline recommendations, (4) selecting recommendations to include in the local protocol, and (5) obtaining practitioner and external expert feedback on the proposed protocol. Updating the protocol followed a similar process.
RESULTS: Of 19 identified leg ulcer practice guidelines, 14 were not evaluated because they did not meet the criteria (ie, treatment-focused guidelines, written in English and developed after 1998). Of the 5 remaining guidelines, 3 were fairly well developed and made similar recommendations. The level of evidence supporting specific recommendations ranged from randomized clinical trial evidence to expert opinion. By comparing the methodologic quality and content of the guidelines, the Task Force reached consensus regarding recommendations appropriate for local application. Two additional guidelines were subsequently identified and incorporated into the local protocol during a scheduled update.
CONCLUSIONS: Local adaptation of international and national guidelines is feasible following facilitation of the Practice Guidelines Evaluation and Adaptation Cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16096396     DOI: 10.1097/00129334-200507000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care        ISSN: 1527-7941            Impact factor:   2.347


  14 in total

Review 1.  The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosis.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Steven Latosinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

2.  A community-researcher alliance to improve chronic wound care.

Authors:  Ian D Graham; Margaret B Harrison; Bob Cerniuk; Sheila Bauer
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2007-05

Review 3.  Adapting clinical practice guidelines to local context and assessing barriers to their use.

Authors:  Margaret B Harrison; France Légaré; Ian D Graham; Béatrice Fervers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Leg-ulcer care in the community, before and after implementation of an evidence-based service.

Authors:  Margaret B Harrison; Ian D Graham; Karen Lorimer; Elaine Friedberg; Tadeusz Pierscianowski; Tim Brandys
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Toward a more effective approach to stroke: Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care.

Authors:  Patrice Lindsay; Mark Bayley; Alison McDonald; Ian D Graham; Grace Warner; Stephen Phillips
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  The Canadian Bandaging Trial: Evidence-informed leg ulcer care and the effectiveness of two compression technologies.

Authors:  Margaret B Harrison; Elizabeth G Vandenkerkhof; Wilma M Hopman; Ian D Graham; Meg E Carley; E Andrea Nelson
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2011-10-13

7.  Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 14. Reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Andrew D Oxman; Holger J Schünemann; Atle Fretheim
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2006-12-08

8.  Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 13. Applicability, transferability and adaptation.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Atle Fretheim; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2006-12-08

Review 9.  The systematic guideline review: method, rationale, and test on chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Christiane Muth; Jochen Gensichen; Martin Beyer; Allen Hutchinson; Ferdinand M Gerlach
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Nurse clinic versus home delivery of evidence-based community leg ulcer care: a randomized health services trial.

Authors:  Margaret B Harrison; Ian D Graham; Karen Lorimer; Elizabeth Vandenkerkhof; Maureen Buchanan; Phil S Wells; Tim Brandys; Tadeusz Pierscianowski
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.