Kenneth I Pakenham1. 1. Behaviour Research and Therapy Centre, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, QLD, Australia. K.Pakenham@psy.uq.edu.au
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study examined benefit finding in MS carers including the dimensionality of benefit finding, relations between carer and care recipient benefit finding, and the effects of carer benefit finding on carer positive and negative adjustment domains. METHOD: A total of 267 carers and their care recipients completed questionnaires at Time 1 and 3 months later, Time 2 (n = 155). Illness data were collected at Time 1, and number of problems, stress appraisal, benefit finding, negative (global distress, negative affect) and positive (life satisfaction, positive affect, dyadic adjustment) adjustment domains were measured at Time 2. RESULTS: Qualitative data revealed seven benefit finding themes, two of which were adequately represented by the Benefit Finding Scale (BFS). Factor analyses indicated two factors (Personal Growth, Family Relations Growth) which were psychometrically sound and showed differential relations with illness and adjustment domains. Although care recipients reported higher levels of benefit finding than carers, their benefit finding reports regarding personal growth were correlated. The carer BFS factors were positively related to carer and care recipient dyadic adjustment. Care recipient benefit finding was unrelated to carer adjustment domains. After controlling for the effects of demographics, care recipient characteristics, problems and appraisal, carer benefit finding was related to carer positive adjustment domains and unrelated to carer negative adjustment domains. CONCLUSION: Findings support the role of benefit finding in sustaining positive psychological states and the communal search for meaning within carer -- care recipient dyads.
PURPOSE: This study examined benefit finding in MS carers including the dimensionality of benefit finding, relations between carer and care recipient benefit finding, and the effects of carer benefit finding on carer positive and negative adjustment domains. METHOD: A total of 267 carers and their care recipients completed questionnaires at Time 1 and 3 months later, Time 2 (n = 155). Illness data were collected at Time 1, and number of problems, stress appraisal, benefit finding, negative (global distress, negative affect) and positive (life satisfaction, positive affect, dyadic adjustment) adjustment domains were measured at Time 2. RESULTS: Qualitative data revealed seven benefit finding themes, two of which were adequately represented by the Benefit Finding Scale (BFS). Factor analyses indicated two factors (Personal Growth, Family Relations Growth) which were psychometrically sound and showed differential relations with illness and adjustment domains. Although care recipients reported higher levels of benefit finding than carers, their benefit finding reports regarding personal growth were correlated. The carer BFS factors were positively related to carer and care recipient dyadic adjustment. Care recipient benefit finding was unrelated to carer adjustment domains. After controlling for the effects of demographics, care recipient characteristics, problems and appraisal, carer benefit finding was related to carer positive adjustment domains and unrelated to carer negative adjustment domains. CONCLUSION: Findings support the role of benefit finding in sustaining positive psychological states and the communal search for meaning within carer -- care recipient dyads.