Literature DB >> 16096093

An empirical test of Lanchester's square law: mortality during battles of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta.

Nicola J R Plowes1, Eldridge S Adams.   

Abstract

Lanchester's models of attrition describe casualty rates during battles between groups as functions of the numbers of individuals and their fighting abilities. Originally developed to describe human warfare, Lanchester's square law has been hypothesized to apply broadly to social animals as well, with important consequences for their aggressive behaviour and social structure. According to the square law, the fighting ability of a group is proportional to the square of the number of individuals, but rises only linearly with fighting ability of individuals within the group. By analyzing mortality rates of fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) fighting in different numerical ratios, we provide the first quantitative test of Lanchester's model for a non-human animal. Casualty rates of fire ants were not consistent with the square law; instead, group fighting ability was an approximately linear function of group size. This implies that the relative numbers of casualties incurred by two fighting groups are not strongly affected by relative group sizes and that battles do not disproportionately favour group size over individual prowess.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16096093      PMCID: PMC1559866          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  4 in total

1.  Group territoriality in two populations of African lions

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Caste and ecology in the social insects.

Authors:  G F Oster; E O Wilson
Journal:  Monogr Popul Biol       Date:  1978

3.  Non-native Ants Are Smaller than Related Native Ants.

Authors:  Terrence P McGlynn
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Chimpanzees and the mathematics of battle.

Authors:  Michael L Wilson; Nicholas F Britton; Nigel R Franks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  4 in total
  12 in total

1.  Numerical assessment affects aggression and competitive ability: a team-fighting strategy for the ant Formica xerophila.

Authors:  Colby J Tanner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Intergroup aggression in meerkats.

Authors:  Mark Dyble; Thomas M Houslay; Marta B Manser; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Fight tactics in wood ants: individuals in smaller groups fight harder but die faster.

Authors:  Tim P Batchelor; Mark Briffa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  From inter-group conflict to inter-group cooperation: insights from social insects.

Authors:  António M M Rodrigues; Jessica L Barker; Elva J H Robinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  An experimental test of Lanchester's models of combat in the neotropical termite Nasutitermes corniger (Blattodea: Termitidae).

Authors:  Elizabeth M Clifton; Paul O Lewis; Elizabeth Jockusch; Eldridge Adams
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Modeling warfare in social animals: a "chemical" approach.

Authors:  Alisa Santarlasci; Gianluca Martelloni; Filippo Frizzi; Giacomo Santini; Franco Bagnoli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The dynamics of social cohesion in response to simulated intergroup conflict in banded mongooses.

Authors:  Elizabeth F R Preston; Faye J Thompson; Solomon Kyabulima; Darren P Croft; Michael A Cant
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  What determines the duration of war? Insights from assessment strategies in animal contests.

Authors:  Mark Briffa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Model Selection in Historical Research Using Approximate Bayesian Computation.

Authors:  Xavier Rubio-Campillo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Interactions with conspecific outsiders as drivers of cognitive evolution.

Authors:  Benjamin J Ashton; Patrick Kennedy; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.