Literature DB >> 1609585

Multicenter study of unicompartmental knee revision. PCA, Marmor, and St Georg compared in 3,777 cases of arthrosis.

A Lindstrand1, A Stenström, S Lewold.   

Abstract

The prospective Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Project contained 772 PCA, 1564 Marmor and 1441 St Georg unicompartment prostheses, implanted for gonarthrosis during the period December 1983-July 1990. Follow-up was performed in September 1991. There was a significant difference in the cumulative revision rate after only 2 years, increasing to 15 percent for the PCA, compared with 5-7 percent for the two other types. The difference between PCA and Marmor/St Georg was loosening of the femoral component. Major polyethylene wear was noted in a quarter of the revised PCA tibial components. The wear pattern of Marmor/St Georg was not analyzed in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1609585     DOI: 10.3109/17453679209154777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  12 in total

1.  Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jared R H Foran; Nicholas M Brown; Craig J Della Valle; Richard A Berger; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Common causes of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a single-centre analysis of four hundred and seventy one cases.

Authors:  Mustafa Citak; Kathrin Dersch; Atul F Kamath; Carl Haasper; Thorsten Gehrke; Daniel Kendoff
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Cementless fixation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Campi; H G Pandit; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty database analysis: is there a winner?

Authors:  Matthew C Lyons; Steven J MacDonald; Lyndsay E Somerville; Douglas D Naudie; Richard W McCalden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Computer-aided preoperative planning in knee osteotomy.

Authors:  E Y Chao; F H Sim
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1995

6.  Does bearing design influence midterm survivorship of unicompartmental arthroplasty?

Authors:  John-Paul Whittaker; Douglas D R Naudie; James P McAuley; Richard W McCalden; Steven J MacDonald; Robert B Bourne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Revision of 33 unicompartmental knee prostheses using total knee arthroplasty: strategy and results.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Gilles Estour; Charbel Nemer; Pierre-Emmanuel Colle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Results of a French multicentre retrospective experience with four hundred and eighteen failed unicondylar knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Michel Bonnin; David Dejour; Gérard Deschamps; Christophe Chol; Benoit Chabert; Ramsay Refaie
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: are failure modes different?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Daoyun Chen; Chen Zhu; Xiaoyun Pan; Xin Mao; Yongyuan Guo; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Revision of unicondylar to total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nashat A Siddiqui; Zafar M Ahmad
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.