Literature DB >> 16095656

An analytical model of enterococci inactivation, grazing, and transport in the surf zone of a marine beach.

Alexandria B Boehm1, Daniel P Keymer, Gregory G Shellenbarger.   

Abstract

An analytical model of enterococci (ENT) concentrations in the surf zone of a long sandy beach is constructed considering the physical processes of dilution by rip currents and alongshore littoral drift, and the biological processes of inactivation and mortality by grazing. The solution is used to construct an expression for the length of shoreline adversely impacted by ENT from a point source. Two non-dimensional parameters are developed whose magnitude can be used to ascertain whether dilution, inactivation, or grazing is the dominant sink for ENT in the surf zone. The model is applied to beaches in southern California, USA. Model input parameters related to physical processes and inactivation are compiled from the literature. Laboratory experiments are conducted to determine grazing mortality rates of ENT (6.5 x 10(-6) s(-1)). Results indicate that at the field sites, between 1000 and 5000 m of shoreline are typically impacted by a continuous point source of ENT. Dilution is the primary cause of decline in ENT concentrations within the surf zone, with inactivation secondary and grazing tertiary. Results recommend strategic positioning of point sources and timing of effluent releases to take advantage of high dilution conditions. Our estimates for grazing mortality rates are within the same order of magnitude as some published inactivation rates, thus we cannot rule out the possibility that grazing is an important sink for ENT, especially in low dilution environments like enclosed bays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16095656     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.06.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  7 in total

1.  Temporal stability of the microbial community in sewage-polluted seawater exposed to natural sunlight cycles and marine microbiota.

Authors:  Lauren M Sassoubre; Kevan M Yamahara; Alexandria B Boehm
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Enterococci in the environment.

Authors:  Muruleedhara N Byappanahalli; Meredith B Nevers; Asja Korajkic; Zachery R Staley; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Microbial load from animal feces at a recreational beach.

Authors:  Mary E Wright; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; Samir Elmir; Lora E Fleming
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 5.553

4.  Pilot- and bench-scale testing of faecal indicator bacteria survival in marine beach sand near point sources.

Authors:  K B Mika; G Imamura; C Chang; V Conway; G Fernandez; J F Griffith; R A Kampalath; C M Lee; C-C Lin; R Moreno; S Thompson; R L Whitman; J A Jay
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.772

5.  How does the cladoceran Daphnia pulex affect the fate of Escherichia coli in water?

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Burnet; Tarek Faraj; Henry-Michel Cauchie; Célia Joaquim-Justo; Pierre Servais; Michèle Prévost; Sarah M Dorner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Application of molecular source tracking and mass balance approach to identify potential sources of fecal indicator bacteria in a tropical river.

Authors:  Kevan M Yamahara; Daniel P Keymer; Blythe A Layton; Sarah P Walters; Rachelle S Thompson; Matt Rosener; Alexandria B Boehm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Meeting report: knowledge and gaps in developing microbial criteria for inland recreational waters.

Authors:  Samuel Dorevitch; Nicholas J Ashbolt; Christobel M Ferguson; Roger Fujioka; Charles D McGee; Jeffrey A Soller; Richard L Whitman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.