Literature DB >> 16095413

Comparison of muscle activation using various hand positions during the push-up exercise.

Robert M Cogley1, Teasha A Archambault, Jon F Fibeger, Mandy M Koverman, James W Youdas, John H Hollman.   

Abstract

Popular fitness literature suggests that varied hand placements during push-ups may isolate different muscles. Scientific literature, however, offers scant evidence that varied hand placements elicit different muscle responses. This study examined whether different levels of electromyographic (EMG) activity in the pectoralis major and triceps brachii muscles are required to perform push-ups from each of 3 different hand positions: shoulder width base, wide base, and narrow base hand placements. Forty subjects, 11 men and 29 women, performed 1 repetition of each push-up. The EMG activity for subjects' dominant arm pectoralis major and triceps brachii was recorded using surface electrodes. The EMG activity was greater in both muscle groups during push-ups performed from the narrow base hand position compared with the wide base position (p < 0.05). This study suggests that, if a goal is to induce greater muscle activation during exercise, then push-ups should be performed with hands in a narrow base position compared with a wide base position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16095413     DOI: 10.1519/15094.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  19 in total

1.  PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION AND INJURY PREVENTION STRATEGIES FOR THE ARMY PHYSICAL FITNESS TEST: TECHNIQUE MATTERS.

Authors:  Mark Thelen; Shane Koppenhaver
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-06

2.  Mind-muscle connection training principle: influence of muscle strength and training experience during a pushing movement.

Authors:  Joaquin Calatayud; Jonas Vinstrup; Markus D Jakobsen; Emil Sundstrup; Juan Carlos Colado; Lars L Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Comparison of the effects of an eight-week push-up program using stable versus unstable surfaces.

Authors:  Iván Chulvi-Medrano; Esteban Martínez-Ballester; Laura Masiá-Tortosa
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-12

4.  Selective Activation of Shoulder, Trunk, and Arm Muscles: A Comparative Analysis of Different Push-Up Variants.

Authors:  Giuseppe Marcolin; Nicola Petrone; Tatiana Moro; Giuseppe Battaglia; Antonino Bianco; Antonio Paoli
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Scapular kinematics and shoulder elevation in a traditional push-up.

Authors:  David N Suprak; Jennifer Bohannon; Gabriel Morales; Joseph Stroschein; Jun G San Juan
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  An electromyographic analysis of shoulder muscle activation during push-up variations on stable and labile surfaces.

Authors:  Jaspal S Sandhu; Shruti Mahajan; Shweta Shenoy
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2008-04

7.  Age differences in energy absorption in the upper extremity during a descent movement: implications for arresting a fall.

Authors:  Meena M Sran; Paula J Stotz; Sarah C Normandin; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 6.053

8.  Push-Ups vs. Bench Press Differences in Repetitions and Muscle Activation between Sexes.

Authors:  Shahab Alizadeh; Machel Rayner; M Mamdouh Ibrahim Mahmoud; David G Behm
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  Serratus Anterior and Upper Trapezius Electromyographic Analysis of the Push-Up Plus Exercise: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fu-Jie Kang; Hsiang-Ling Ou; Kun-Ying Lin; Jiu-Jenq Lin
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Elbow joint fatigue and bench-press training.

Authors:  Yen-Po Huang; You-Li Chou; Feng-Chun Chen; Rong-Tyai Wang; Ming-Jer Huang; Paul Pei-Hsi Chou
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.