Literature DB >> 16094280

Beliefs about low back pain in the Norwegian general population: are they related to pain experiences and health professionals?

Erik L Werner1, Camilla Ihlebaek, Jan Sture Skouen, Even Laerum.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A baseline study of the general population and the health care providers in 3 Norwegian counties.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate if beliefs about low back pain (LBP) are related to personal experiences and profession sought for care. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Myths about LBP that are abandoned by health professionals are still alive in the public. Such myths represent pain avoidance beliefs and passive coping strategies that may hinder normal spontaneous recovery from an episode of LBP.
METHODS: A sample of 1502 randomly selected people was interviewed by telephone, and all the 1105 physicians, physiotherapists, and chiropractors in the area were sent a questionnaire in April 2002. All respondents gave their responses in terms of degree of agreement to 6 statements reflecting beliefs about LBP.
RESULTS: Personal back pain experiences were important for beliefs about LBP. People with a history of previous back pain had more faith in the 2 statements "Back pain recovers best by itself" (52.2%) and "In most cases back pain recovers by itself in a couple of weeks" (32.5%) than those with current pain (36.9% and 20.9%, respectively, P < 0.000). There were significant differences in beliefs between physicians and the chiropractors concerning the same 2 statements, and these differences were also reflected in the beliefs of patients treated by the different professional groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Belief in spontaneous recovery from LBP seems to be positively correlated to previous experience with LBP without current pain. Patients of the various health care providers seem to have a faith in spontaneous recovery similar to that of their health care provider. These differences may frustrate the public and patients who visit more than one provider, and hinder collaboration among professional groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16094280     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000171909.81632.fe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

Review 1.  Managing low back pain in the primary care setting: the know-do gap.

Authors:  N Ann Scott; Carmen Moga; Christa Harstall
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

2.  Subclassification of low back pain: a cross-country comparison.

Authors:  Evdokia V Billis; Christopher J McCarthy; Jacqueline A Oldham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Healthcare provider back pain beliefs unaffected by a media campaign.

Authors:  Erik L Werner; Douglas P Gross; Stein Atle Lie; Camilla Ihlebaek
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 4.  A review of assessment tools of illness representations: are these adapted for a work disability prevention context?

Authors:  Marie-France Coutu; Marie-José Durand; Raymond Baril; Marie-Elise Labrecque; Suzy Ngomo; Daniel Côté; Annick Rouleau
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-08-22

Review 5.  Representations: an important key to understanding workers' coping behaviors during rehabilitation and the return-to-work process.

Authors:  Marie-France Coutu; Raymond Baril; Marie-José Durand; Daniel Côté; Annick Rouleau
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-06-13

6.  Adherence to clinical practice guidelines among three primary contact professions: a best evidence synthesis of the literature for the management of acute and subacute low back pain.

Authors:  Lyndon G Amorin-Woods; Randy W Beck; Gregory F Parkin-Smith; James Lougheed; Alexandra P Bremner
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-09

Review 7.  Fear of pain as a prognostic factor in chronic pain: conceptual models, assessment, and treatment implications.

Authors:  Dennis C Turk; Hilary D Wilson
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2010-04

8.  It's safe to move! A protocol for a randomised controlled trial investigating the effect of a video designed to increase people's confidence becoming more active despite back pain.

Authors:  Edel O'Hagan; Adrian C Traeger; Siobhan M Schabrun; Sean O'Neill; Benedict Martin Wand; Aidan Cashin; Christopher Michael Williams; Ian A Harris; James H McAuley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Expectations, perceptions, and physiotherapy predict prolonged sick leave in subacute low back pain.

Authors:  Silje E Reme; Eli M Hagen; Hege R Eriksen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Belief reinforcement: one reason why costs for low back pain have not decreased.

Authors:  Max Zusman
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2013-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.