Literature DB >> 16094122

Biomechanical strength of human nasal septal lining: comparison of the constituent layers.

David W Kim1, Kristin K Egan, Kevin O'Grady, Dean M Toriumi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Nasal septal perforation is a common complication following surgery involving the nasal septum. Septoplasty, septorhinoplasty, and submucosal resection may result in the inadvertent resection of perichondrium, which may predispose the patient to septal perforations. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled human cadaver study testing the biomechanical strength of the constituent layers of nasal septal lining.
METHODS: Uniform samples of nasal septal mucosa, perichondrium, and a composite of both layers were obtained from five fresh human cadavers. The mechanical tensile strength of these layers was evaluated and compared with the Instron 4301 Mechanical Testing System (Canton, MA).
RESULTS: Mixed-effects regression analysis demonstrated a significant difference in the tensile strength of the three groups (mean values +/- SD: mucosa, 662 +/- 308 g; perichondrium, 1370 +/- 798 g; composite, 2340 +/- 1252 g). All three pairwise comparisons among the three groups showed a significant difference in tensile strength.
CONCLUSION: The perichondrial layer imparts the majority of the biomechanical strength to septal lining. Lining flaps containing both perichondrium and mucosa are stronger than flaps with either perichondrium or mucosa alone. Dissection in the subperichondrial plane during septal surgery provides a stronger septal flap and may prevent the development of nasal septal perforation during nasal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16094122     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000168579.94187.f6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  10 in total

1.  Changes in the tangent modulus of rabbit septal and auricular cartilage following electromechanical reshaping.

Authors:  Amanda Lim; Dmitry E Protsenko; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Risk of nasal septal perforation following septoplasty in patients with allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Ozgul Topal; Sakir Bilge Celik; Seyra Erbek; Selim S Erbek
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Nasoseptal Perforation: from Etiology to Treatment.

Authors:  Carla Pereira; Alfonso Santamaría; Cristobal Langdon; Mauricio López-Chacón; José Hernández-Rodríguez; Isam Alobid
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.806

4.  Obtaining maximal stability with a septal extension technique in East asian rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Jae Yong Jeong
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-01-13

5.  Compressive and tensile mechanical properties of the porcine nasal septum.

Authors:  Ayman A Al Dayeh; Susan W Herring
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Regenerative and proliferative activities of chondrocyte based on the degree of perichondrial injury in rabbit auricular cartilage.

Authors:  Ji-Hun Mo; Do-Joon Lee; Phil-Sang Chung; Young-Jun Chung
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Structural grafts and suture techniques in functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Holger G Gassner
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-04-27

8.  Redefining the septal L-strut in septal surgery.

Authors:  Jung-Seob Lee; Dong Chang Lee; Dong-Heon Ha; Dong Heon Ha; Sung Won Kim; Dong-Woo Cho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Real time in-vivo miniature endoscopic surveillance system for imaging of nasopharynx.

Authors:  Chwee Ming Lim; Gangodu Nagaraja Rao; Hongliang Ren
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-04-18

10.  Long-term Outcomes of Subtotal Septal Reconstruction in Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Scott A Asher; Akta S Kakodkar; Dean M Toriumi
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.611

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.