Literature DB >> 16092784

Profiling Canadian nurses' preferred knowledge sources for clinical practice.

Carole A Estabrooks1, Huey Chong, Kristin Brigidear, Joanne Profetto-McGrath.   

Abstract

Several researchers have examined nurses' knowledge sources within the context of research utilization, but conclusions are equivocal. Common problems include a lack of replication, conflicting results, poor generalizability of results, and unclear implications for practice. The objectives of this study were to: (a) describe sources of knowledge and their frequency of use among staff nurses across 7 surgical units, (b) compare knowledge-source patterns across the units, (c) determine whether knowledge-source preferences correlate to research utilization scores, and (d) profile staff nurses' knowledge-source patterns over time. A total of 230 nurses in 5 adult and 2 pediatric surgical units from 4 hospitals in the Canadian provinces of Alberta and Ontario completed a self-administered survey. The results were compared to the findings of previous studies. Nurses' knowledge-source preferences were consistent across the 7 units despite differences in education and in research utilization scores. Across all units, nurses preferred to use knowledge gained through personal experience and interactions with co-workers and with individual patients rather than journal articles or textbooks. These findings are consistent with the longitudinal comparison in the 2 earlier studies. In contrast to the knowledge privileged by nurse clinicians, researchers tend to place greater value on research-based knowledge than on experience-based knowledge. To increase research utilization in the practice setting, researchers and others need first to understand the reasons behind clinicians' valuing of experiential and social knowledge sources and then to consider research dissemination and implementation strategies that are more closely aligned with clinician preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16092784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Nurs Res        ISSN: 0844-5621


  11 in total

Review 1.  Interventions encouraging the use of systematic reviews in clinical decision-making: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laure Perrier; Kelly Mrklas; Sasha Shepperd; Maureen Dobbins; K Ann McKibbon; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Data for improvement and clinical excellence: protocol for an audit with feedback intervention in long-term care.

Authors:  Anne E Sales; Corinne Schalm
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Factors affecting delivery of evidence-based procedural pain care in hospitalized neonates.

Authors:  Margot A Latimer; Celeste C Johnston; Judith A Ritchie; Sean P Clarke; Debra Gilin
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  Describing knowledge encounters in healthcare: a mixed studies systematic review and development of a classification.

Authors:  Dominic Hurst; Sharon Mickan
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: a systematic review.

Authors:  David S Thompson; Carole A Estabrooks; Shannon Scott-Findlay; Katherine Moore; Lars Wallin
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses.

Authors:  Janet E Squires; Donna Moralejo; Sandra M Lefort
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Barriers to research utilization and research use among registered nurses working in the care of older people: does the BARRIERS scale discriminate between research users and non-research users on perceptions of barriers?

Authors:  Anne-Marie Boström; Kerstin Nilsson Kajermo; Gun Nordström; Lars Wallin
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Evidence based practice beliefs and implementation among nurses: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kjersti Stokke; Nina R Olsen; Birgitte Espehaug; Monica W Nortvedt
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2014-03-25

9.  Linguistic validation of the Alberta Context Tool and two measures of research use, for German residential long term care.

Authors:  Matthias Hoben; Marion Bär; Cornelia Mahler; Sarah Berger; Janet E Squires; Carole A Estabrooks; Andreas Kruse; Johann Behrens
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-01-31

10.  Knowledge of anaphylaxis among Emergency Department staff.

Authors:  Irwani Ibrahim; Bao Li Chew; Wai Wai Zaw; Hugo P Van Bever
Journal:  Asia Pac Allergy       Date:  2014-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.