Literature DB >> 1609135

Evaluation of articular cartilage: radiographic and cross-sectional imaging techniques.

C W Hayes1, W F Conway.   

Abstract

Many diagnostic modalities may be used to evaluate articular cartilage. Plain radiography remains the preferred initial study for cartilage evaluation, although even specialized views such as weight-bearing, tunnel, and flexion lateral projections are insensitive in the detection of early cartilage loss. Compared with newer modalities, conventional arthrography has limited capacity for the assessment of cartilage. Computed tomography performed after intraarticular injection of contrast material (ie, CT arthrography) has improved accuracy but is essentially limited to the axial plane. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, with its superb soft-tissue contrast and multiplanar capabilities, has shown promise in depicting articular cartilage. Cartilage is best depicted when an "arthrogram effect" is present, achieved with T2-weighted spin-echo imaging, with some gradient-echo pulse sequences, and when intraarticular contrast material is used. If performed with such techniques, MR imaging is the method of choice for evaluating specific cartilage loss, osteochondritis dissecans, and other osteochondral abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1609135     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.12.3.1609135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  8 in total

1.  The diagnostic accuracy of acetabular labral tears using magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Gemma Hilton; Andoni P Toms; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Radiology rounds. Osteochondritis dissecans.

Authors:  M Margolis; M K McLennan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging in osteoarthrosis of the dysplastic hip.

Authors:  Y Hasegawa; H Fukatsu; T Matsuda; T Iwase; H Iwata
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Ultrasonographic imaging of the hand and wrist in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  P J Lund; A Heikal; M J Maricic; E A Krupinski; C S Williams
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Investigation of the Relationship between Anterior Knee Pain and Chondromalacia Patellae and Patellofemoral Malalignment.

Authors:  Idil Kurut Aysin; Ayhan Askin; Berna Dirim Mete; Ece Guvendi; Murat Aysin; Hikmet Kocyigit
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2018-02-01

6.  Relation of the chondromalatia patellae to proximal tibial anatomical parameters, assessed with MRI.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Tabary; Azadehsadat Esfahani; Mehdi Nouraie; Mohammad Reza Babaei; Ali Reza Khoshdel; Farnaz Araghi; Mostafa Shahrezaee
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Running and Physical Activity in an Air-Polluted Environment: The Biomechanical and Musculoskeletal Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study 4HAIE (Healthy Aging in Industrial Environment-Program 4).

Authors:  Daniel Jandacka; Jaroslav Uchytil; David Zahradnik; Roman Farana; Dominik Vilimek; Jiri Skypala; Jan Urbaczka; Jan Plesek; Adam Motyka; Denisa Blaschova; Gabriela Beinhauerova; Marketa Rygelova; Pavel Brtva; Klara Balazova; Veronika Horka; Jan Malus; Julia Freedman Silvernail; Gareth Irwin; Miika T Nieminen; Victor Casula; Vladimir Juras; Milos Golian; Steriani Elavsky; Lenka Knapova; Radim Sram; Joseph Hamill
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  3-T T2 mapping magnetic resonance imaging for biochemical assessment of normal and damaged glenoid cartilage: a prospective arthroscopy-controlled study.

Authors:  Felix Wuennemann; Laurent Kintzelé; Alexander Braun; Felix Zeifang; Michael W Maier; Iris Burkholder; Marc-André Weber; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Christoph Rehnitz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.