RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Filling intravertebral clefts during percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is considered to be important for optimal pain control. It is often difficult to detect clefts on non-contrast MR and some fractures show a solid pattern distribution of injected cement without a cleft sign on non-contrast MR. In this study, we evaluated usefulness of fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MR to predict a solid pattern distribution of injected cement on PVP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with 35 vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis were studied. We performed sagittal T1-weighted, T2-weighted and fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images prior to PVP. First we evaluated the presence of fluid-filled or gas-containing clefts on non-contrast MR. Next we evaluated contrast-enhanced MR of the same vertebrae for the presence of cleft-shaped unenhanced areas within the diffuse enhancement area. We correlated MR findings with cement distribution patterns of injected cement. RESULTS: Based on MR findings, 35 osteoporotic fractures were divided into 3 types. Type 1 (11 fractures, 31%): There were no clefts on non-contrast MR and no unenhanced areas on contrast-enhanced MR; Type 2 (13, 37%): There were no clefts on non-contrast MR but there were unenhanced areas on contrast-enhanced MR; Type 3 (13, 37%): There were clefts on non-contrast MR and unenhanced areas on contrast-enhanced MR. Of 35 osteoporotic fractures, thirteen vertebral fractures (37%) were noted to contain clefts on non-contrast MR, while 24 vertebral fractures (69%) contained unenhanced areas on contrast-enhanced MR. Cement distributed as a solid pattern within clefts or unenhanced areas in all fractures with them. CONCLUSION: Fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MR is useful to predict a solid pattern distribution of injected cement prior to PVP.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Filling intravertebral clefts during percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is considered to be important for optimal pain control. It is often difficult to detect clefts on non-contrast MR and some fractures show a solid pattern distribution of injected cement without a cleft sign on non-contrast MR. In this study, we evaluated usefulness of fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MR to predict a solid pattern distribution of injected cement on PVP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with 35 vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis were studied. We performed sagittal T1-weighted, T2-weighted and fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images prior to PVP. First we evaluated the presence of fluid-filled or gas-containing clefts on non-contrast MR. Next we evaluated contrast-enhanced MR of the same vertebrae for the presence of cleft-shaped unenhanced areas within the diffuse enhancement area. We correlated MR findings with cement distribution patterns of injected cement. RESULTS: Based on MR findings, 35 osteoporotic fractures were divided into 3 types. Type 1 (11 fractures, 31%): There were no clefts on non-contrast MR and no unenhanced areas on contrast-enhanced MR; Type 2 (13, 37%): There were no clefts on non-contrast MR but there were unenhanced areas on contrast-enhanced MR; Type 3 (13, 37%): There were clefts on non-contrast MR and unenhanced areas on contrast-enhanced MR. Of 35 osteoporotic fractures, thirteen vertebral fractures (37%) were noted to contain clefts on non-contrast MR, while 24 vertebral fractures (69%) contained unenhanced areas on contrast-enhanced MR. Cement distributed as a solid pattern within clefts or unenhanced areas in all fractures with them. CONCLUSION: Fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MR is useful to predict a solid pattern distribution of injected cement prior to PVP.