| Literature DB >> 16086838 |
Barend M deC Bronsvoort1, Alfons Renz, Virginia Tchakouté, Vincent N Tanya, David Ekale, Alexander J Trees.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ivermectin (Mectizan, Merck and CO. Inc.) is being widely used in the control of human onchocerciasis (Onchoverca volvulus) because of its potent effect on microfilariae. Human studies have suggested that, at the standard dose of 150 microg/kg an annual treatment schedule of ivermectin reversibly interferes with female worm fertility but is not macrofilaricidal. Because of the importance of determining whether ivermectin could be macrofilaricidal, the efficacy of high and prolonged doses of ivermectin and a related avermectin, doramectin, were investigated in cattle infected with O. ochengi.Entities:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16086838 PMCID: PMC1200428 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2883-4-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Filaria J ISSN: 1475-2883
Nodule counts (including all removed nodules at 24 mpt), diameter (means ± standard deviations) and median age scores of female worms before and 24 months after the start of treatment in cattle, following 7 monthly treatments with ivermectin 500 μg/kg subcutaneously, doramectin 500 μg/kg subcutaneously or no treatment. Nodule numbers were adjusted for nodules removed for assay. (the number of animals in each group, n = 3 except ‡ n = 2; number of nodules per group, n = 6 except * where n = 4).
| Timepoint | 0 mpt | 24 mpt | ||||
| count1 | Diameter2 (mm) | ♀age score3 | count | Diameter (mm) | ♀age score | |
| Control | 75 ± 26 | 5.9 ± 0.6 | 1.5 | 61 ± 25 ‡ | 6.7 ± 0.7* | 2* |
| Ivermectin | 73 ± 25 | 7.4 ± 1.2 | 1 | 72 ± 19 | 6.5 ± 0.4 | 3 |
| Doramectin | 73 ± 35 | 6.9 ± 1.1 | 2 | 66 ± 36 | 6.9 ± 0.9 | 3 |
1 Two-way ANOVA: effect of interaction of treatment and mpt p = 0.630; effect of treatment p = 0.891; effect of mpt p = 0.510
2 Two-way ANOVA: effect of interaction of treatment and mpt p = 0.270;effect of treatment p = 0.403; effect of mpt p = 0.996
3 Not tested statistically
Geometric mean (3 skin snips)O. ochengi mf density+1 per 100 mg skin in cattle following 7 monthly treatments with ivermectin 500 μg/kg subcutaneously, doramectin 500 μg/kg subcutaneously or untreated controls. Animals lost to follow-up are indicated in the table.
| 0 mpt | 3 mpt | 6 mpt | 9 mpt | 12 mpt | 15 mpt | 18 mpt | 21 mpt | 24 mpt | 36 mpt | ||
| Control | 3803 | 635 | 203 | 0 | 18 | a | |||||
| 841 | 260 | 1515 | 774 | 1135 | 604 | 1698 | 185 | 257 | c | ||
| 4578 | 1583 | 911 | 712 | 767 | 291 | 982 | 975 | 1462 | 281 | ||
| Ivermectin | 509 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 2 | |
| 671 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | b | ||
| 240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Doramectin | 6901 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 75 | |
| 1607 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 146 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
a: Slaughtered following tetracycline therapy for dermatophilus infection, b: slaughtered due to septic arthritis, c lost to follow-up
The ratio of the number of male/female (♂/♀) worms examined for each group at each timepoint (one female worm was found per nodule) and the median male (♂MOT) and (♀MOT) motility score before and up to 24 months the after the start of treatment in cattle following 7 monthly treatments with ivermectin 500 μg/kg subcutaneously, doramectin 500 μg/kg subcutaneously or untreated controls.
| mpt | 0 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 24 | |
| Control | ♂/♀ | 5/6 | 5/5 | 8/5 | 4/4 | 3/4 |
| ♂MOT | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| ♀MOT | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2/6 | 2 | |
| Ivermectin | ♂/♀ | 3/6 | 5/6 | 6/6 | 0.3 | 3/6 |
| ♂MOT | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 | 2 | |
| ♀MOT | 2 | 2* | 2 | 2* | 1.5* | |
| Doramectin | ♂/♀ | 11/6 | 5/6 | 9/6 | 6/6 | 9/6 |
| ♂MOT | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| ♀MOT | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0.5** |
*= 1 calcified dead worm, **= 2 calcified dead worms
Figure 1Mean (with standard deviation) OD492 of female (a) and male (b) O. ochengi formazan formation after MTT reduction before and up to 24 months after treatment (from 18 months after the start of treament OD492 is standardised for 10 mm of length). ■ = control, □ = ivermectin, = doramectin. (N.B. The mean OD492 reading for males was first calculated for each nodule and this was then used to calculate the group means given in Figure 1b) Foot notes. (a) Two-way ANOVA for effect of timepoint and treatment group: Interaction effect between group and timepoint p = 0.44; group effect p = 0.62; effect of timepoint p = 0.02. (b) Two-way ANOVA for effect of timepoint and treatment group: Interaction effect between group and timepoint p = 0.69; group effect p = 0.79; effect of timepoint p = 0.02.
Figure 2Mean number (× 1000) of embryonic stages 'o' (small and large morulae, horseshoe and pretzel stages) and intra-uterine mf of O. ochengi per nodule, over-laid with the number of pathological stages '■ 'calculated from the median percent of pathological forms before and up to 24 months following treatment with ivermectin or doramectin.