Literature DB >> 16085311

Die hard: a blend of freezing and fleeing as a dynamic defense--implications for the control of defensive behavior.

David Eilam1.   

Abstract

Freezing, fleeing or fighting back are general defensive responses in many taxa. These defenses are mutually exclusive, since a prey cannot simultaneously flee and fight, or freeze and flee. Each of these defenses by itself is rudimentary and probably cannot provide a completely effective means to elude predation. Freezing is efficient only if employed before the prey is spotted by the predator, otherwise the prey becomes a stationary, easy to catch target. In fleeing, the prey can move directly away and maximize its distance from the predator, move toward the predator to confine it to a single clashing point, or dodge sideways to evade the attack. Prey can also run in a straight path that is efficient against slow or distant predators, or in a zigzag path that is efficient when a raptor is close or fast. In all, freezing and fleeing constitute together a complex and flexible defensive response, and are probably controlled by different motor systems that are inter-connected to allow fast switching between these behaviors, as required for an effective and versatile response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16085311     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  57 in total

1.  Neural control of behavioural choice in juvenile crayfish.

Authors:  William H Liden; Mary L Phillips; Jens Herberholz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Two-stage muscle activity responses in decisions about leg movement adjustments during trip recovery.

Authors:  Zrinka Potocanac; Mirjam Pijnappels; Sabine Verschueren; Jaap van Dieën; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The vomeronasal organ mediates interspecies defensive behaviors through detection of protein pheromone homologs.

Authors:  Fabio Papes; Darren W Logan; Lisa Stowers
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Prey adaptation along a competition-defense tradeoff cryptically shifts trophic cascades from density- to trait-mediated.

Authors:  Zachary T Wood; David C Fryxell; Emma R Moffett; Michael T Kinnison; Kevin S Simon; Eric P Palkovacs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Animal escapology II: escape trajectory case studies.

Authors:  Paolo Domenici; Jonathan M Blagburn; Jonathan P Bacon
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 6.  Animal escapology I: theoretical issues and emerging trends in escape trajectories.

Authors:  Paolo Domenici; Jonathan M Blagburn; Jonathan P Bacon
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  TrkB Activation during a Critical Period Mimics the Protective Effects of Early Visual Experience on Perception and the Stability of Receptive Fields in Adult Superior Colliculus.

Authors:  David B Mudd; Timothy S Balmer; So Yeon Kim; Noura Machhour; Sarah L Pallas
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Satiation level affects anti-predatory decisions in foraging juvenile crayfish.

Authors:  Abigail C Schadegg; Jens Herberholz
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 9.  Plasticity of defensive behavior and fear in early development.

Authors:  Christoph P Wiedenmayer
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Induction of aberrant agonistic behavior by a combination of serotonergic and dopaminergic manipulation in rats.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kai; Shuichi Ueda
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.