Literature DB >> 16083386

Psychometric properties of the Hong psychological reactance scale.

Lijiang Shen1, James Price Dillard.   

Abstract

The Hong Psychological Reactance Scale (HPRS; Hong & Felda, 1996) was developed to measure the individual difference in reactance proneness, that is, a person's trait propensity to experience psychological reactance. We performed confirmatory factor analyses to test the dimensionality of the 11-item version of the HPRS. Three message outcome variables (i.e., perceived threat to freedom, attitude, and intention) served as reference variables to test the construct validity of the HPRS. Data from 3 studies (Ns = 188, 200, and 233) of reactions to persuasive health messages confirmed the existence of 4 first-order factors but also provided evidence that the HPRS can be treated as unidimensional at the second order. The relationships between the second-order factor and the message outcome variables provided evidence of the validity of the scale.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16083386     DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Assess        ISSN: 0022-3891


  9 in total

1.  Reactance to anti-binge drinking messages: testing cognitive and affective mechanisms among noncollege emerging adults.

Authors:  Bethany R Shorey-Fennell; Renee E Magnan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2019-02-27

2.  The jingle-jangle fallacy in adolescent autonomy in the family: in search of an underlying structure.

Authors:  Stijn Van Petegem; Maarten Vansteenkiste; Wim Beyers
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2012-10-31

3.  Psychosocial assessments for HIV+ African adolescents: establishing construct validity and exploring under-appreciated correlates of adherence.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Lowenthal; Tafireyi C Marukutira; Jennifer Chapman; Keboletse Mokete; Katherine Riva; Ontibile Tshume; Jessica Eby; Mogomotsi Matshaba; Gabriel M Anabwani; Robert Gross; Karen Glanz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Coercive and legitimate authority impact tax honesty: evidence from behavioral and ERP experiments.

Authors:  Katharina Gangl; Daniela M Pfabigan; Claus Lamm; Erich Kirchler; Eva Hofmann
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  Analysis and Psychoeducational Implications of the Behavior Factor During the COVID-19 Emergency.

Authors:  Jesús de la Fuente; Douglass F Kauffman; Michael S Dempsy; Yashu Kauffman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-16

6.  Therapeutic reactance in adolescents: the psychometrics of the Therapeutic Reactance Scale in adolescents.

Authors:  Richard A Inman; Ana Margarida Sousa; Diana Cunha; Paulo Moreira
Journal:  Scand J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Psychol       Date:  2019-05-30

7.  Mental Health and Related Factors of Adolescent Students During Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.

Authors:  Tian'ge Lu; Yao Yu; Zhonghui Zhao; Rongjuan Guo
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Unveiling the effects of consumers' psychological distance on their reactance and related behavioral outcomes: Do lockdown restrictions matter?

Authors:  Xianglan Chen; Yachao Duan; Huma Ittefaq; Yahui Duan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-10-03

9.  To comply or not comply? A latent profile analysis of behaviours and attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Sabina Kleitman; Dayna J Fullerton; Lisa M Zhang; Matthew D Blanchard; Jihyun Lee; Lazar Stankov; Valerie Thompson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.