Literature DB >> 20072122

Differential role of muscarinic transmission within the entorhinal cortex and basolateral amygdala in the processing of irrelevant stimuli.

Segev Barak1, Ina Weiner.   

Abstract

Cholinergic projections to the entorhinal cortex (EC) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) mediate distinct cognitive processes through muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs). In this study, we sought to further differentiate the role of muscarinic transmission in these regions in cognition, using the latent inhibition (LI) phenomenon. LI is a cross-species phenomenon manifested as poorer conditioning to a stimulus experienced as irrelevant during an earlier stage of repeated non-reinforced pre-exposure to that stimulus, and is considered to index the ability to ignore, or to in-attend to, irrelevant stimuli. Given our recent findings that systemic administration of the mAChR antagonist scopolamine can produce two contrasting LI abnormalities in rats, ie, abolish LI under conditions yielding LI in non-treated controls, or produce abnormally persistent LI under conditions preventing its expression in non-treated controls, we tested whether mAChR blockade in the EC and BLA would induce LI abolition and persistence, respectively. We found that intra-EC scopolamine infusion (1, 10 mug per hemisphere) abolished LI when infused in pre-exposure or both pre-exposure and conditioning, but not in conditioning alone, whereas intra-BLA scopolamine infusion led to persistent LI when infused in conditioning or both stages, but not in pre-exposure alone. Although cholinergic innervation of the EC and BLA has long been implicated in attention to novel stimuli and in processing of motivationally significant stimuli, respectively, our results provide evidence that EC mAChRs also have a role in the development of inattention to stimuli, whereas BLA mAChRs have a role in re-attending to previously irrelevant stimuli that became motivationally relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20072122      PMCID: PMC3055402          DOI: 10.1038/npp.2009.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  68 in total

1.  Excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala fail to produce impairment in visual learning for auditory secondary reinforcement but interfere with reinforcer devaluation effects in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  L Málková; D Gaffan; E A Murray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Double dissociation of basolateral and central amygdala lesions on the general and outcome-specific forms of pavlovian-instrumental transfer.

Authors:  Laura H Corbit; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Both pre- and posttraining excitotoxic lesions of the basolateral amygdala abolish the expression of olfactory and contextual fear conditioning.

Authors:  G Cousens; T Otto
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 4.  The switching model of latent inhibition: an update of neural substrates.

Authors:  I Weiner; J Feldon
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  The interface between dopamine neurons and the amygdala: implications for schizophrenia.

Authors:  S N Haber; J L Fudge
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Insular cortical projections to functional regions of the striatum correlate with cortical cytoarchitectonic organization in the primate.

Authors:  M Chikama; N R McFarland; D G Amaral; S N Haber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Central cholinergic systems and cognition.

Authors:  B J Everitt; T W Robbins
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Transient impairment of cholinergic function in the rat insular cortex disrupts the encoding of taste in conditioned taste aversion.

Authors:  C Naor; Y Dudai
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Acetylcholine: a neurotransmitter for learning and memory?

Authors:  A Blokland
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1995-11

Review 10.  Scopolamine model of dementia: electroencephalogram findings and cognitive performance.

Authors:  U Ebert; W Kirch
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.686

View more
  4 in total

1.  Dissociating scopolamine-induced disrupted and persistent latent inhibition: stage-dependent effects of glycine and physostigmine.

Authors:  Segev Barak; Ina Weiner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  The prominent role of stimulus processing: cholinergic function and dysfunction in cognition.

Authors:  Maura L Furey
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.710

3.  Muscarinic receptors modulate the intrinsic excitability of infralimbic neurons and consolidation of fear extinction.

Authors:  Edwin Santini; Marian Sepulveda-Orengo; James T Porter
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Amnesia of inhibitory avoidance by scopolamine is overcome by previous open-field exposure.

Authors:  Natalia C Colettis; Marina Snitcofsky; Edgar E Kornisiuk; Emilio N Gonzalez; Jorge A Quillfeldt; Diana A Jerusalinsky
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.460

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.