Literature DB >> 16081058

Never getting to zero: Elementary school students' understanding of the infinite divisibility of number and matter.

Carol L Smith1, Gregg E A Solomon, Susan Carey.   

Abstract

Clinical interviews administered to third- to sixth-graders explored children's conceptualizations of rational number and of certain extensive physical quantities. We found within child consistency in reasoning about diverse aspects of rational number. Children's spontaneous acknowledgement of the existence of numbers between 0 and 1 was strongly related to their induction that numbers are infinitely divisible in the sense that they can be repeatedly divided without ever getting to zero. Their conceptualizing number as infinitely divisible was strongly related to their having a model of fraction notation based on division and to their successful judgment of the relative magnitudes of fractions and decimals. In addition, their understanding number as infinitely divisible was strongly related to their understanding physical quantities as infinitely divisible. These results support a conceptual change account of knowledge acquisition, involving two-way mappings between the domains of number and physical quantity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16081058     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  An ERP study on the processing of common fractions.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Ziqiang Xin; Fuhong Li; Qi Wang; Cody Ding; Hong Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Sources of Group and Individual Differences in Emerging Fraction Skills.

Authors:  Steven A Hecht; Kevin J Vagi
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2010-11

3.  Error Patterns in Ordering Fractions Among At-Risk Fourth-Grade Students.

Authors:  Amelia S Malone; Lynn S Fuchs
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2016-08-03

4.  An ERP study of the processing of common and decimal fractions: how different they are.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Qi Wang; Chongde Lin; Cody Ding; Xinlin Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Possible number systems.

Authors:  Lance J Rips; Samantha Thompson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.526

6.  Inhibitory control and decimal number comparison in school-aged children.

Authors:  Margot Roell; Arnaud Viarouge; Olivier Houdé; Grégoire Borst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.