| Literature DB >> 16079064 |
Xi Huang1, Weihong Li, Michael D Attfield, Arthur Nádas, Krystyna Frenkel, Robert B Finkelman.
Abstract
Based on the first National Study of Coal Workers' Pneumoconiosis (CWP) and the U.S. Geological Survey database of coal quality, we show that the prevalence of CWP in seven coal mine regions correlates with levels of bioavailable iron (BAI) in the coals from that particular region (correlation coefficient r = 0.94, p < 0.0015). CWP prevalence is also correlated with contents of pyritic sulfur (r = 0.91, p < 0.0048) or total iron (r = 0.85, p < 0.016) but not with coal rank (r = 0.59, p < 0.16) or silica (r = 0.28, p < 0.54). BAI was calculated using our model, taking into account chemical interactions of pyrite, sulfuric acid, calcite, and total iron. That is, iron present in coals can become bioavailable by pyrite oxidation, which produces ferrous sulfate and sulfuric acid. Calcite is the major component in coals that neutralizes the available acid and inhibits iron's bioavailability. Therefore, levels of BAI in the coals are determined by the available amounts of acid after neutralization of calcite and the amount of total iron in the coals. Using the linear fit of CWP prevalence and the calculated BAI in the seven coal mine regions, we have derived and mapped the pneumoconiotic potencies of 7,000 coal samples. Our studies indicate that levels of BAI in the coals may be used to predict coal's toxicity, even before large-scale mining.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16079064 PMCID: PMC1280334 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7679
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
CWP prevalence and mean levels (± SD; mmol/100 g dry coal) of physicochemical properties of coal samples from each coal mine region.
| State | No. of mines | No. of samples | CWP (%) | MR (C:H) | SiO2 | CaO | Spy | SO4 | Fe2O3 | As | Ni |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PA | 3 | 9 | 45.35 | 1.28 ± 0.12 | 71.05 ± 46.22 | 3.97 ± 2.13 | 34.76 ± 21.88 | 1.23 ± 1.06 | 12.48 ± 7.4 | 0.33 ± 0.4 | 0.26 ± 0.17 |
| OH | 1 | 6 | 31.80 | 1.09 ± 0.07 | 84.66 ± 26.96 | 5.23 ± 7.17 | 37.08 ± 20.03 | 1.37 ± 1.20 | 12.86 ± 8.8 | 0.17 ± 0.13 | 0.14 ± 0.19 |
| KY | 4 | 13 | 29.00 | 1.20 ± 0.07 | 69.82 ± 24.06 | 5.69 ± 9.70 | 25.48 ± 30.53 | 0.43 ± 0.6 | 9.78 ± 9.11 | 0.15 ± 0.22 | 0.22 ± 0.11 |
| WV | 4 | 8 | 28.25 | 1.32 ± 0.13 | 49.53 ± 24.00 | 4.58 ± 3.17 | 17.89 ± 29.57 | 0.21 ± 0.21 | 7.27 ± 8.22 | 0.22 ± 0.25 | 0.13 ± 0.05 |
| AL | 1 | 13 | 16.70 | 1.26 ± 0.07 | 71.84 ± 49.59 | 2.88 ± 2.96 | 17.07 ± 19.74 | 0.11 ± 0.99 | 8.85 ± 5.86 | 0.40 ± 0.29 | 0.17 ± 0.13 |
| UT | 2 | 4 | 13.10 | 1.08 ± 0.07 | 40.82 ± 8.51 | 7.33 ± 5.27 | 7.97 ± 4.35 | 0.16 ± 0.06 | 2.69 ± 2.61 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.03 ± 0.00 |
| CO | 9 | 41 | 4.60 | 1.04 ± 0.06 | 117.3 ± 82.53 | 4.61 ± 2.3 | 3.43 ± 3.08 | 0.21 ± 0.14 | 3.68 ± 1.86 | 0.03 ± 0.05 | 0.07 ± 0.06 |
MR, molar ratio.
Average levels (mmol/100 g dry coal) of total H2SO4 (1/2 Spy + SO4), available amount of acid (1/2 Spy + SO4 − CaO), total iron, and predicted BAI.a
| State | No. of mines | CWP (%) | 1/2 Spy + SO4 | 1/2 Spy + SO4 − CaO | Fe2O3 | BAI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PA | 9 | 45.35 | 18.61 | 14.63 | 12.48 | 11.82 |
| OH | 6 | 31.80 | 19.91 | 14.69 | 12.86 | 9.07 |
| KY | 13 | 29.00 | 13.17 | 7.49 | 9.78 | 6.25 |
| WV | 8 | 28.25 | 9.15 | 4.57 | 7.27 | 4.77 |
| AL | 13 | 16.70 | 9.65 | 6.77 | 8.85 | 5.29 |
| UT | 4 | 13.10 | 4.14 | −3.19 | 2.69 | 1.09 |
| CO | 41 | 4.60 | 1.92 | −2.69 | 3.68 | 0.15 |
Levels of Spy, SO4, CaO, and Fe2O3 were obtained from the USGS database for each coal mine (Bragg et al. 1998).
CaO was presented as percentage of high-temperature ashes in the USGS database and was converted to percentage of dry coal based on the ash yield. Because 1 mol CaCO3 produces 1 mol CaO in the ashes, the molar amount of CaO per 100 g coal was used as a measure of CaCO3 levels in the coals.
Values in the individual coal samples were calculated first and then averaged for the coal mine region for each of physicochemical parameters listed.
BAI was calculated as follows: if the difference in [1/2 Spy + SO4 − CaO] is ≤ 0 for the individual coal mine, the BAI is given as 0. If the difference in [1/2 Spy + SO4 − CaO] is > 0, a lesser value between [1/2 Spy + SO4 − CaO] or total iron (Fe2O3) is given for BAI (see text for details).
Correlation among average levels of various parameters with CWP prevalence.
| C/H | SiO2 | CaO | Spy | SO42− | 1/2 Spy + SO42− | 1/2 Spy + SO42− − CaO | Fe2O3 | BAI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.59 | 0.28 | −0.18 | 0.91 | 0.58 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.94 | |
| Lower 95% CI | −0.26 | −0.55 | −0.78 | 0.35 | −0.26 | 0.40 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.66 |
| Upper 95% CI | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.60 | 0.99 | 0.90 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.999 |
| 0.16 | 0.54 | 0.69 | 0.0048 | 0.17 | 0.006 | 0.01 | 0.016 | 0.0015 |
Figure 1Correlation between prevalence of CWP and BAI in seven U.S. states’ coal mine regions. Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of coal samples per state for which analytical data were available. The expected prevalence of CWP (%) = 3.11 BAI + 7.04.
Figure 2Mapping and prediction of the pneumoconiotic potency of coal by the level of BAI.