Literature DB >> 16077386

Assumed oxygen consumption frequently results in large errors in the determination of cardiac output.

Ullrich Fakler1, Christian Pauli, Michael Hennig, Walter Sebening, John Hess.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the differences in assumed and measured oxygen consumption values for the determination of cardiac output by using the Fick principle in a pediatric population with congenital heart disease.
METHODS: The patient population consisted of 143 patients with a mean age of 11.3 years (age range, 2 days to 23.8 years) undergoing cardiac catheterization during general anesthesia and with mechanical ventilation. Oxygen consumption was measured with a standard commercial analyzing system (Deltatrac II; Datex, Engström, Helsinki, Finland). Assumed oxygen consumption values were calculated according to the formulas of Krovetz and Goldbloom and LaFarge and Miettinen. Comparisons between measurements and assumptions were performed by Bland-Altman plots. Two-sided paired t tests were used to assess a difference of the assumed and measured values.
RESULTS: The range of measured oxygen consumption values was between 55.2 and 249 mL . min -1 . m -2 . The Krovetz-Goldbloom formula led to systematically larger values compared with the measured values (P = .0001; mean difference of -53.3 mL . min -1 . m -2 ; 95% confidence interval, -56.7 to -49.8 mL . min -1 . m -2 ). The use of the LaFarge-Miettinen formula tends to overestimate oxygen consumption (P = .0037; mean difference of -15.9 mL . min -1 . m -2 ; 95% confidence interval, -26.5 to -5.4 mL . min -1 . m -2 ). A similarly poor agreement was found when analyzing a subgroup of 25 patients with Fontan-type circulation.
CONCLUSION: The use of assumed instead of measured oxygen consumption values introduces large errors in the determination of cardiac output.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16077386     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.02.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  18 in total

1.  Thermodilution vs Estimated Fick Cardiac Output Measurement in Clinical Practice: An Analysis of Mortality From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (VA CART) Program and Vanderbilt University.

Authors:  Alexander R Opotowsky; Edward Hess; Bradley A Maron; Evan L Brittain; Anna E Barón; Thomas M Maddox; Laith I Alshawabkeh; Bradley M Wertheim; Meng Xu; Tufik R Assad; Jonathan D Rich; Gaurav Choudhary; Ryan J Tedford
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Thermodilution and Fick cardiac outputs differ: impact on pulmonary hypertension evaluation.

Authors:  Wassim H Fares; Sarah K Blanchard; George A Stouffer; Patricia P Chang; Wayne D Rosamond; Hubert James Ford; Robert M Aris
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.409

3.  Impact of Catheterization Lab Computer Software Settings on Hemodynamic Assessment of Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Zaher Fanari; Anitha Rajamanickam; Mathew Grove; Sumaya Hammami; Cassie Walls; Paul Kolm; William Weintraub; Andrew J Doorey
Journal:  Del Med J       Date:  2016-07

4.  The Impact of Direct Cardiac Output Determination On Using A Widely Available Direct Continuous Oxygen Consumption Measuring Device On The Hemodynamic Assessment of Aortic Valve.

Authors:  Zaher Fanari; Matthew Grove; Anitha Rajamanickam; Sumaya Hammami; Cassie Walls; Paul Kolm; Mitchell Saltzberg; William S Weintraub; Andrew J Doorey
Journal:  Del Med J       Date:  2016-09

5.  Can we better estimate resting oxygen consumption by incorporating arterial blood gases and spirometric determinations?

Authors:  Adriano R Tonelli; Xiao-Feng Wang; Anara Abbay; Qi Zhang; José Ramos; Kevin McCarthy
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.258

6.  Cardiac output determination using a widely available direct continuous oxygen consumption measuring device: a practical way to get back to the gold standard.

Authors:  Zaher Fanari; Matthew Grove; Anitha Rajamanickam; Sumaya Hammami; Cassie Walls; Paul Kolm; Mitchell Saltzberg; William S Weintraub; Andrew J Doorey
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2016-02-27

7.  Comparison of calculated with measured oxygen consumption in children undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Achim Schmitz; Oliver Kretschmar; Walter Knirsch; Katja Woitzek; Christian Balmer; Maren Tomaske; Urs Bauersfeld; Markus Weiss
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Validation of the Innocor device for noninvasive measurement of oxygen consumption in children and adults.

Authors:  Shreya S Sheth; Dawn M Maxey; Alice E Drain; Jeffrey A Feinstein
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 9.  Pulmonary Vascular Disease: Hemodynamic Assessment and Treatment Selection-Focus on Group II Pulmonary Hypertension.

Authors:  Bhavadharini Ramu; Brian A Houston; Ryan J Tedford
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-04

10.  Cardiac catheterization in children with pulmonary hypertensive vascular disease: consensus statement from the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute, Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Task Forces.

Authors:  Maria Jesus Del Cerro; Shahin Moledina; Sheila G Haworth; Dunbar Ivy; Maha Al Dabbagh; Hanaa Banjar; Gabriel Diaz; Alexandria Heath-Freudenthal; Ahmed Nasser Galal; Tilman Humpl; Snehal Kulkarni; Antonio Lopes; Ana Olga Mocumbi; G D Puri; Beyra Rossouw; S Harikrishnan; Anita Saxena; Patience Udo; Lina Caicedo; Omar Tamimi; Ian Adatia
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.017

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.