Literature DB >> 16077306

International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races.

Leslie G Farkas1, Marko J Katic, Christopher R Forrest, Kurt W Alt, Ivana Bagic, Georgi Baltadjiev, Eugenia Cunha, Marta Cvicelová, Scott Davies, Ilse Erasmus, Rhonda Gillett-Netting, Karel Hajnis, Arianne Kemkes-Grottenthaler, Irena Khomyakova, Ashizava Kumi, J Stranger Kgamphe, Nakamura Kayo-daigo, Thuy Le, Andrzej Malinowski, Marina Negasheva, Sotiris Manolis, Murat Ogetürk, Ramin Parvizrad, Friedrich Rösing, Paresh Sahu, Chiarella Sforza, Stefan Sivkov, Nigar Sultanova, Tatjana Tomazo-Ravnik, Gábor Tóth, Ahmet Uzun, Eman Yahia.   

Abstract

When anthropometric methods were introduced into clinical practice to quantify changes in the craniofacial framework, features distinguishing various races/ethnic groups were discovered. To treat congenital or post-traumatic facial disfigurements in members of these groups successfully, surgeons require access to craniofacial databases based on accurate anthropometric measurements. Normative data of facial measurements are indispensable to precise determination of the degree of deviations from the normal. The set of anthropometric measurements of the face in the population studied was gathered by an international team of scientists. Investigators in the country of the given ethnic group, experienced and/or specially trained in anthropometric methods, carried out the measurements. The normal range in each resultant database was then established, providing valuable information about major facial characteristics. Comparison of the ethnic groups' databases with the established norms of the North America whites (NAW) offered the most suitable way to select a method for successful treatment. The study group consisted of 1470 healthy subjects (18 to 30 years), 750 males and 720 females. The largest group (780 subjects, 53.1%) came from Europe, all of them Caucasians. Three were drawn from the Middle-East (180 subjects, 12.2%), five from Asia (300 subjects, 20.4%) and four from peoples of African origin (210 subjects, 14.3%). Their morphological characteristics were determined by 14 anthropometric measurements, 10 of them used already by classic facial artists, Leonardo da Vinci and Albrecht Dürer, complemented by four measurements from the nasal, labio-oral and ear regions. In the regions with single measurements, identical values to NAW in forehead height, mouth width, and ear height were found in 99.7% in both sexes, while in those with multiple measurements, vertical measurements revealed a higher frequency of identical values than horizontal ones. The orbital regions exhibited the greatest variations in identical and contrasting measurements in comparison to NAW. Nose heights and widths contrasted sharply: in relation to NAW the nose was very or extremely significantly wide in both sexes of Asian and Black ethnic groups. Among Caucasians, nose height significantly differed from NAW in three ethnic groups, with one shorter and two greater. In the Middle Eastern groups nose width was identical to those of NAW but the height was significantly greater. The present study, conducted by investigators working separately across the world and with small samples of the population, is clearly preliminary in nature and extent. Yet it may fulfill its mission if medical and anthropological investigators continue the work of establishing normative data of the face. These data are urgently needed by medical professionals but have been lacking up till now in western and northern Europe, Asia, and Africa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16077306     DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000171847.58031.9e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  102 in total

1.  Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography.

Authors:  R Olszewski; L Frison; M Wisniewski; J M Denis; S Vynckier; G Cosnard; F Zech; H Reychler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Variations of structural components: specific intercultural differences in facial morphology, skin type, and structures.

Authors:  Aisha McKnight; Adeyiza O Momoh; Jamal M Bullocks
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Nasal Analysis and Anatomy: Anthropometric Proportional Assessment in Asians-Aesthetic Balance from Forehead to Chin, Part I.

Authors:  JeongHoon Suhk; JinSoo Park; Anh H Nguyen
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Facial indices of north and South Indian adults: reliability in stature estimation and sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Prasanna Lc; Bhosale S; D'Souza As; Mamatha H; Thomas Rh; Sachin Ks
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-08-01

Review 5.  Aesthetic analysis of the ideal eyebrow shape and position.

Authors:  Esin Yalçınkaya; Cemal Cingi; Hakan Söken; Seçkin Ulusoy; Nuray Bayar Muluk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Comparing the face to the body, which is better for identification?

Authors:  Teghan Lucas; Maciej Henneberg
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 7.  Application of digital anthropometry for craniofacial assessment.

Authors:  Yasas S N Jayaratne; Roger A Zwahlen
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-03-17

Review 8.  Aging Differences in Ethnic Skin.

Authors:  Neelam A Vashi; Mayra Buainain de Castro Maymone; Roopal V Kundu
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2016-01

9.  Frontal-view nasolabial soft tissue alterations after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in Class III patients.

Authors:  Siamak Hemmatpour; Fatemeh Kadkhodaei Oliadarani; Ali Hasani; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Anthropometric analysis of palpebral fissure dimensions and its position in South Indian ethnic adults.

Authors:  P Vasanthakumar; Pramod Kumar; Mohandas Rao
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2013-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.