Literature DB >> 16076974

Responsibility in health care: a liberal egalitarian approach.

A W Cappelen1, O F Norheim.   

Abstract

Lifestyle diseases constitute an increasing proportion of health problems and this trend is likely to continue. A better understanding of the responsibility argument is important for the assessment of policies aimed at meeting this challenge. Holding individuals accountable for their choices in the context of health care is, however, controversial. There are powerful arguments both for and against such policies. In this article the main arguments for and the traditional arguments against the use of individual responsibility as a criterion for the distribution of scarce health resources will be briefly outlined. It is argued that one of the most prominent contemporary normative traditions, liberal egalitarianism, presents a way of holding individuals accountable for their choices that avoids most of the problems pointed out by the critics. The aim of the article is to propose a plausible interpretation of liberal egalitarianism with respect to responsibility and health care and assess it against reasonable counter-arguments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16076974      PMCID: PMC1734208          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2004.010421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  5 in total

1.  Persuasion and coercion for health: ethical issues in government efforts to change life-styles.

Authors:  Daniel I Wikler
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q       Date:  1978

2.  The high-risk liver allograft recipient. Should allocation policy consider outcome?

Authors:  F L Delmonico; R L Jenkins; R Freeman; J Vacanti; J Bradley; J L Dienstag; C Trey; W D Lewis; C W Lillehei; H Auchincloss
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-05

3.  Could we hold people responsible for their own adverse health?

Authors:  J Harris
Journal:  J Contemp Health Law Policy       Date:  1995

Review 4.  QALYS and ethics: a health economist's perspective.

Authors:  A Williams
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  A Williams
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-08-03
  5 in total
  34 in total

1.  Drinking in the last chance saloon: luck egalitarianism, alcohol consumption, and the organ transplant waiting list.

Authors:  Andreas Albertsen
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-06

2.  Responsibility for health: personal, social, and environmental.

Authors:  D B Resnik
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Patients' charters and health responsibilities.

Authors:  Harald Schmidt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-11-14

4.  Personality, socioeconomic status, and all-cause mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Benjamin P Chapman; Kevin Fiscella; Ichiro Kawachi; Paul R Duberstein
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Why have Non-communicable Diseases been Left Behind?

Authors:  Florencia Luna; Valerie A Luyckx
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2020-03-20

6.  Healthier lifestyles after retirement in Europe? Evidence from SHARE.

Authors:  Martina Celidoni; Vincenzo Rebba
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-09-26

7.  Genetics and Personal Responsibility for Health.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  New Genet Soc       Date:  2014-06-30

Review 8.  Patient health incentives: ethical challenges and frameworks.

Authors:  Eran P Klein
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-12

9.  The ideal of equal health revisited: definitions and measures of inequity in health should be better integrated with theories of distributive justice.

Authors:  Ole Frithjof Norheim; Yukiko Asada
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2009-11-18

10.  Israeli lay persons' views on priority-setting criteria for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Perla Werner
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.