Literature DB >> 1575628

The high-risk liver allograft recipient. Should allocation policy consider outcome?

F L Delmonico1, R L Jenkins, R Freeman, J Vacanti, J Bradley, J L Dienstag, C Trey, W D Lewis, C W Lillehei, H Auchincloss.   

Abstract

The Boston Center for Liver Transplantation has accumulated one of the larger series of liver allograft recipients. This review has provided an opportunity to examine recent pronouncements by Medicare regarding patient selection and survival and to question whether the current allocation scheme best utilizes a scarce supply of donor liver allografts. Patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, sclerosing cholangitis, and metabolic derangements have enjoyed excellent survival: in aggregate, 78.9% at 1 year. In contrast, patients suffering from acute hepatic failure, patients requiring life support, or patients with primary graft failure who need a second liver transplant did poorly compared with other recipient groups: 45% 1-year survival. This center's experience reflects a more realistic expectation of patient survival because it considers the high-risk recipient by diagnosis and urgency status. This study also suggests that assessment of outcome should be a component of allocation planning in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Boston Center for Liver Transplantation; Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1575628     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420050103013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  6 in total

Review 1.  Responsibility in health care: a liberal egalitarian approach.

Authors:  A W Cappelen; O F Norheim
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Prioritization and organ distribution for liver transplantation.

Authors:  O Bronsther; J J Fung; A Izakis; D Van Thiel; T E Starzl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Disease gravity and urgency of need as guidelines for liver allocation.

Authors:  B Eghtesad; O Bronsther; W Irish; A Casavilla; K Abu-Elmagd; D Van Thiel; A Tzakis; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Single-Center Experience on Liver Transplantation for Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score 40 Patients.

Authors:  Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Spyridon Vernadakis; Andreas Paul; Dieter P Hoyer; Fuat H Saner; Anja Gallinat
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Orthotopic liver transplantation in high-risk patients: risk factors associated with mortality and infectious morbidity.

Authors:  T Gayowski; I R Marino; N Singh; H Doyle; M Wagener; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1998-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How Should We Improve the Thresholds?

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Shimamura; Ryoichi Goto; Masaaki Watanabe; Norio Kawamura; Yasutsugu Takada
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.