Literature DB >> 16076515

Evaluation of World Health Organization partograph implementation by midwives for maternity home birth in Medan, Indonesia.

Mohammad Fahdhy1, Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to assess the effectiveness of promoting the use of the World Health Organization (WHO) partograph by midwives for labour in a maternity home by comparing outcomes after birth.
SETTING: Medan city, North Sumatera Province, Indonesia. PARTICIPANTS: 20 midwives who regularly conducted births in maternity homes, randomly allocated into two equal groups.
DESIGN: cluster randomised-control trial. INTERVENTION: under supervision from a team of obstetricians, midwives in the intervention group were introduced to the WHO partograph, trained in its use and instructed to use it in subsequent labours. MEASUREMENTS AND
FINDINGS: there were 304 eligible women with vertex presentations among 358 labouring women in the intervention group and 322 among 363 in the control group. Among the intervention group, 304 (92.4%) partographs were correctly completed. From 71 women with the graph beyond the alert line, 42 (65%) were referred to hospital. Introducing the partograph significantly increased referral rate, and reduced the number of vaginal examinations, oxytocin use and obstructed labour. The proportions of caesarean sections and prolonged labour were not significantly reduced. Apgar scores of less than 7 at 1min was reduced significantly, whereas Apgar scores at 5mins and requirement for neonatal resuscitation were not significantly different. Fetal death and early neonatal death rates were too low to compare. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: a training programme with follow-up supervision and monitoring may be of use when introducing the WHO partograph in other similar settings, and the findings of this study suggest that the appropriate time of referral needs more emphasis in continuing education.
CONCLUSION: the WHO partograph should be promoted for use by midwives who care for labouring women in a maternity home.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16076515     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2004.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  13 in total

Review 1.  Reducing stillbirths: screening and monitoring during pregnancy and labour.

Authors:  Rachel A Haws; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Tanya Soomro; Esme V Menezes; Gary L Darmstadt; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 2.  60 Million non-facility births: who can deliver in community settings to reduce intrapartum-related deaths?

Authors:  Gary L Darmstadt; Anne C C Lee; Simon Cousens; Lynn Sibley; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; France Donnay; Dave Osrin; Abhay Bang; Vishwajeet Kumar; Steven N Wall; Abdullah Baqui; Joy E Lawn
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.561

3.  Comparison of two WHO partographs: a one year randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Swamy Mallaiah Kenchaveeriah; Kamal Prakash Patil; Tania Gurudeep Singh
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-03-01

4.  Partograph Utilization and Associated Factors among Obstetric Care Providers Working in Public Health Facilities of Wolaita Zone, 2017.

Authors:  Mesfin Markos; Aseb Arba; Kebreab Paulos
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2020-07-01

Review 5.  The Partograph in Childbirth: An Absolute Essentiality or a Mere Exercise?

Authors:  Asha R Dalal; Ameya C Purandare
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-10-16

6.  Stillbirths in rural hospitals in the gambia: a cross-sectional retrospective study.

Authors:  Abdou Jammeh; Siri Vangen; Johanne Sundby
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-30

7.  Effect of partograph use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term and their babies.

Authors:  Tina Lavender; Anna Cuthbert; Rebecca Md Smyth
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-06

8.  Implementation of the partograph in India's JSY cash transfer programme for facility births: a mixed methods study in Madhya Pradesh province.

Authors:  Sarika Chaturvedi; Sourabh Upadhyay; Ayesha De Costa; Joanna Raven
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  A realist review of the partograph: when and how does it work for labour monitoring?

Authors:  Carol Bedwell; Karen Levin; Celia Pett; Dame Tina Lavender
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term.

Authors:  Tina Lavender; Anna Hart; Rebecca M D Smyth
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.